Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all there was a fire behind my house of a car repair shed I say shed because it was a total eyesore  its a corrugated barn type shed  so it will be pulled down shortly the police had evacuated the houses, so my wife and I spent the night at a friends

home,

 

I was delighted it was on fire as it spoils my view, I was also delighted that I had my X-T2  so got some good phots

 

and sent them to my local paper whom used them,

 

see below:

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

 

had to resize files 1000kb hope the look ok had to downsize from 40meg to 800/900kb

 

anyway that was my excitement for last Sunday evening

 

the fire had started after they put an old sofa and chairs round the side and set it alight then they proceeded to throw a large 

cupboard on the fire,

 

I mean anyone with half a brain would not have placed old furniture up against a corrugated shed then set alight

 

the Fuji is a great camera  I Love my X-T2

 

 

Tom G  Scotland

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes what's the limit per image on this forum? 40meg to 800/900kb - they still look reasonable to my eyes. I hope you got some recompense for the images? That will be a double-plus for you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The limits are, per post 1000 Kb. No limit in the numbe rof posts or the total size of space used.

 

If you don’t save the image at 100% quality, many programs allow for this that in Photoshop terms was called “ save for web”, you can post huge pictures here (but in the end the screen size will limit the way they show in the browser).

 

I normally post pictures here and even those that weigh less than half of the maximum look better than the third image posted above.

Edited by milandro
Link to post
Share on other sites

I usually restrict my images to 900kb when exported from LR as a JPG file. I did this on another forum that uses the same software as this forum.

Edited by Him
Link to post
Share on other sites

actually the best thing to do is restrict the size 1250 px on the base is generally showing very well even at 50% quality and they may weigh less than half the allocate size per post.

 

Naturally there is no use than more than 72dpi.

Edited by milandro
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...