Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is anyone else having trouble getting sharp images with exposures longer than 2-3 seconds.   I think I am ticking  all the boxes I use a very  stable Manfrotto tripod with a locked down head,  A nice tight manfrotto L-bracket  tripod mount.  IS is turned off and I am using a timer or the app for actuation.  it seems if a seagull walks past the shot develops movement.  I Really want to use longer exposure times 30 sec to several minutes but I cant get them sharp they are unusable.  I  dont particularly want to take a time exposure and then try to get a faster shutter speed to add the sharpness back onto the landscape or urban landscape.  All ideas are welcomed.  thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the forum.

Can you post an image to demonstrate what you are getting?

Unfortunately there are a lot of components where a problem in any one of them will ruin an image. You may have already tried this, but here are some things:

Tripod and mount (mount, in this case, probably will be the ball head). Putting rubber feet on the tripod can help for some surfaces as can installing the spikes that often come with tripod kits and make sure the legs are firmly smooshed into the ground. Not all tripods do well at suppressing vibrations for long exposure photography, they are fine for fast shutter speeds. Any looseness in the locks will let the camera shake.

Whatever the ball head’s weight limit is, try not to load it beyond one-half of that rating. For example, if the ball head (and tripod) are rated to hold 20 lbs. —- about 9 kilograms —- only put up to about half that weight, 10 lbs. —- about 4,5 kilograms.

Definitely turn off all image stabilization tech, as well as any pixel shifting tech.

How much surface area is sticking up into the air matters. If the camera is up where any breeze, no matter how slight, can catch it, the camera can sway. The sturdier the tripod with the camera mounted as low to the ground as you can get, the better the images will turn out. If you have a neck-strap or similar on the camera, watch it as session goes on. If the strap is moving, the camera can be swaying.

I am guessing you are using camera lenses. There is something called focus creep and something called zoom creep. Unless you have the lens perfectly horizontal, and even if you do have it that way, as the temperature changes, the focus will change and you will have to reset it.

Are you using the electronic shutter? Sometimes using the mechanical shutter can cause a slight vibration the tripod will not absorb so the vibration goes back into the image. This is more noticeable for highly magnified subjects and usually for not landscape work, but it is there.

Are you using the built in interval timer?

One thing to note with landscape work, bushes and trees move and  once you get past ten seconds or so, your image will really show that smearing motion blur.

I hope this helps.

 

Edited by jerryy
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Sometimes questions about cameras' resolution and astrophotography pop up. More often the questions are noise related, but 'are more pixels better' has its fans. 'Sometimes, it depends' is about the best answer out there. I think maybe it is better to instead ask back 'do you use your camera for daytime photography as well and do you like the images you get?' If so, then stick with the camera you have. Everything from pixel size to smoke levels or turbulence in the atmosphere to the telescopes' optical limits and so much more impact how images turn out. There are so many rabbit holes to fall into, that if you go down into them, it may be many years before anyone sees you come up for air. 😄 There are two things though that can be said 'with certainty' about using a higher resolution camera in place of your current gear: 1.     The angle of view becomes wider in the higher resolution camera's image. Think of it as if you use a normal lens to get a photo, then put on a wide angle lens and take the same photo. The region covered by the higher resolution camera is wider. 2.     The supporting equipment; mount, tripod, image processing gear, etc. etc. become much more [expletive deleted] expensive 😇, that is you need a sturdier tripod and mount, more computer -- drive space and powerful processors, and so forth and so on.  From last night's Sturgeon Moon, an example: Both of these images are taken of the same subject using the same lens, at just about the same time, but with two different camera bodies. I got a first set of images, took the first camera body off of the lens, put the second camera body onto the lens and got a second set of images.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      Tamron 150-600mm at 600mm. F16, 1/60s, ISO 160. 6240 pixels x 4160 pixels. Tamron 150-600mm at 600mm. F16, 1/60s, ISO 200. 4896 pixels x 3264 pixels. Okay, so they look the same or close enough. That is because both images have been scaled to 900 pixels wide. That and the essentially empty backgrounds are misleading. Here are crops from the full size images: 1801 x 1505 pixels (scaled to 900 pixels wide in this image) from 6240 x 4160 pixels leaves 4439 pixels wide for other stuff. 1178 x 1205 pixels (scaled to 900 pixels wide in this image) from 4896 x 3264 pixels leaves 3718 pixels wide for other stuff. If you like your camera's images, use it for daytime and night photography. There is not much good in chasing resolution hoping more pixels will better resolve astronomical objects just like they do in the daytime images, making the fluff on distant bird feathers pop out. As a thought, those beautiful images from the Hubble are made using "The UV/optical channel has two CCDs, each 2048×4096 pixels, while the IR detector is 1024×1024." (*1) The new James Webb Telescope is using an array of 4 megapixel cameras similar to how terrestrial giga-pixel images are made. (*2) I believe other agencies such as the European Space Agency (ESA) do something similar with their gear. *1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wide_Field_Camera_3 *2 https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/58179/4-megapixels-seems-rather-low-why-werent-james-webbs-sensors-updated-to-highe Sturgeon Super Moon: https://nasaspacenews.com/2025/08/sturgeon-moon-2025-two-magical-nights-under-one-full-moon/   edited to upload the correct cropped images.  
    • Have a look at the video from pal2tech, it seems like there are some confusing and/or non-intuitive things to trip over in the bluetooth setup since this firmware update.  
    • You have to delete the device (camera) in the phone's bluetooth settings first, then it can be removed in the X-App. The pal2tech bloke goes over some of the confusing and non-intuitive stuff in this video    
    • Hello Steve I was interested in your post regards the Bluetooth problem since the recent firmware update. It is causing me problems too. You have a One plus 12 and I have Oppo Find X8 Pro which also runs on colour OS, my version is 15.0.0.840 Basically I believe these phones probably come out of the same Factory in China. They are great devices. I paired my Fujifilm X100VI seamlessly on the old firmware and was amazed how firmware could be upgraded through Bluetooth/WiFi using an app as my Lumix, Sony, Nikon FF gear was the usual download update, ectract bin file. Copy to formatted card, fully charged battery and update through menu.  Upgraded to a new firmware with ease some months ago when first getting X100VI. Had to reset phone without unpairing, another issue with Google pay. Unrelated.  Reconnected camera to my Oppo, saw notification about firmware update in last 10 days. Upgraded to the latest through Bluetooth/WiFi direct.. Took a while but was successfully updated. Then I have to re-pair the phone, now it says to remove the previous device X100VI, so I follow procedure to forget the previous pairing. However it doesn't get rid of it and I ended up doing reset network settings on camera. Didn't work either. Then I did a factory reset of the entire camera which is a pain as you have to set up the whole thing again and I didn't really back up my settings. Anyway, this also didn't work so I ended up doing another factory reset of my Oppo phone. After setting that up, the problem is still there. Can't get rid of the original pairing. Huge disappointment, loads of time wasted to no avail.  I'm in Australia so I've got on to Fujifilm Aus. The representative was fantastic and he walked me through all the trouble shooting steps. Exhausted all avenues and had to accept defeat. He did mention that a lot of people had contacted them and were having issues since this new firmware upgrade. So we can only hope that they might do another firmware patch to fix the problem or update Fujifilm X App. I am almost ready to sell this camera after these dramas. Considering maybe going back to Sony, Nikon, Lumix (2nd Gen). All pricey stuff.  Look forward to hearing from you.  Cheers Ian     
    • Thanks, pw-pix!  I am planning to buy the Fuji lens this weekend Mike
×
×
  • Create New...