Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, how is it going?

 

This is going to be my first post here and I am very excited about it. Anyway, I am 26 years old pizza lover and a semi-pro portrait/headshots photographer. Since 2011 i have paid all of my 3 Ba degrees and most of my bills with photography and mainly shoot weddings-events until 2016. Oh and i am starting Ma degree on Commercial Photography at NTU this year!

 

My first DSLR was a 5d mkii and I sold all of my Canon gear in 2012 and switched to Pentax. Main reason was to have a lighter kit with much better ergonomics. I still love my Pentax gear, and since selling them is extremely hard, i will be holding on to the kit for awhile. However Constant AF issues, sub-par AF performance, Never arriving 3rd party HSS support and every increasing bulk of the system, K-1, started to put me off.

Fuji, on the other hand, has some tempting points over other systems in general. First being KAIZEN. than very sexy looking cameras, most compact aps-c system?, and lastly Godox announcing to support fuji tll/hss was my turning point.

 

 

For body/bodies, i will be getting an X-t1 or X-t2 depending on my budget. But can't pick my starting setup for the system. Although i am a prime person, 70-200 f/2.8 had always been my most used lens during my wedding time.

 

 

23mm f/1.4 or 35mm f/1.4 / f/2 is likely going to be my first lens in the system and next one to follow up.

 

For wide-angle, 16mm f/1.4 seems like a great choice and i will pick it up after my portrait lens.

 

 

But here comes the hard part for me. 56mm f/1.6, 90mm f/2 and 50-140mm f/2.8

 

135mm,FF, is my favourite focal length but i rather have 56mm first to have a "more complete kit". Yet Samyang 50mm f/1.2 is another cheaper alternative to fill that option but i have to get used to Fuji cameras and manual focus first, which is not a great feeling on DSLRs.

Buying 90mm + 56mm looks bit too expensive to get into, considering i am not selling any Pentax gear + Ma fees will make it hard to get both. 

 

50-140, on the other hand, covers both focal lengths and has IS. Since having been using IBIS for last 6 years i believe it is an important feature for my work by now. 

 

 

And one last question. Be honest and tell me how good is Fuji X-system actually + for studio and location portrait work. I haven't used one more than few hours so its good to know long term effects, such as unstoppable GAS i have been reading about Fuji glass.

Sorry for the long post and thanks for all the future answers/discussions  ^_^

Link to post
Share on other sites

I came from a 5Dmk2 and traded it in for my Fuji gear. I got an X-T1, grip, 18-55, 23mm f/1.4, and a 35mm f/1.4 right off the bat.

 

The X-T1 wasn't really a solid choice. It was good enough for most things, but still felt like a lot of a compromise in order to get a lot less size and weight.

 

I've traded my way up to the X-T2 and I'm much happier. I've also gotten rid of the 35mm f/1.4 in favor of the f/2 for focus speed, and gotten the 50-140. 

 

I was missing a really fast lens for dreamy bokeh, so rather than shelling out for the 56mm, I got a Mitakon 35mm f/.95 which I've been using for those sorts of portraits, and I'm really happy now. 

 

The 90 and the 56 are both excellent lenses, though they're both super specialized. If you shoot portraits a lot, then really you're going to want either the 56, 90, or 50-140. I haven't ever been let down by my 50-140, so that's my suggestion. The 56 focuses too slowly for me, and the 90 is just a bit too inflexible for my style of shooting. 

 

I also got the 16mm and really liked it, but I only ever used it for test shots here and there, and never found myself using it in real life. I never took a "real" photo with it, and sold it a few months after buying it. I get by with my kit lens being my widest.

 

"How good is the X system actually"

 

It's really good, once you bend your workflow to accommodate a bit of the quirks. The flash system is lacking still, but using Canon triggers for studio strobes works just fine. For portrait work in general, I'm really pleased with it, especially after the most recent update to the X-T2 which gave some welcome upgrades to workflow. The only times I've been tempted to switch back to a different system have been in terms of processing large amounts of photos. RAF files are slow to work with, even on fast machines, and getting fine detail AND color AND full latitude out of the files can be an arduous task. Recently Iridient came out with "X-Transformer" which you can use as a plugin in Lightroom which has really helped a LOT though, so things are getting easier and easier every day.

 

I can confidently say that my best photos I've ever taken have been on a Fuji, and it's going to take a LOT to get me to change to anything else again. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I came from a 5Dmk2 and traded it in for my Fuji gear. I got an X-T1, grip, 18-55, 23mm f/1.4, and a 35mm f/1.4 right off the bat.

 

The X-T1 wasn't really a solid choice. It was good enough for most things, but still felt like a lot of a compromise in order to get a lot less size and weight.

 

I've traded my way up to the X-T2 and I'm much happier. I've also gotten rid of the 35mm f/1.4 in favor of the f/2 for focus speed, and gotten the 50-140. 

 

I was missing a really fast lens for dreamy bokeh, so rather than shelling out for the 56mm, I got a Mitakon 35mm f/.95 which I've been using for those sorts of portraits, and I'm really happy now. 

 

The 90 and the 56 are both excellent lenses, though they're both super specialized. If you shoot portraits a lot, then really you're going to want either the 56, 90, or 50-140. I haven't ever been let down by my 50-140, so that's my suggestion. The 56 focuses too slowly for me, and the 90 is just a bit too inflexible for my style of shooting. 

 

I also got the 16mm and really liked it, but I only ever used it for test shots here and there, and never found myself using it in real life. I never took a "real" photo with it, and sold it a few months after buying it. I get by with my kit lens being my widest.

 

"How good is the X system actually"

 

It's really good, once you bend your workflow to accommodate a bit of the quirks. The flash system is lacking still, but using Canon triggers for studio strobes works just fine. For portrait work in general, I'm really pleased with it, especially after the most recent update to the X-T2 which gave some welcome upgrades to workflow. The only times I've been tempted to switch back to a different system have been in terms of processing large amounts of photos. RAF files are slow to work with, even on fast machines, and getting fine detail AND color AND full latitude out of the files can be an arduous task. Recently Iridient came out with "X-Transformer" which you can use as a plugin in Lightroom which has really helped a LOT though, so things are getting easier and easier every day.

 

I can confidently say that my best photos I've ever taken have been on a Fuji, and it's going to take a LOT to get me to change to anything else again. 

 

 

Thank your for the reply mate  ^_^

 

I have looked the 3rd party lenses such as Samyang and Mitakon but i might want to get AF lenses  IF i continue to do events/weddings. I am trying to bounce commercial work, hence Ma degree (mostly for networking though).

 

Sad to hear 56mm AF speed is not fast enough, i was expecting it to be usable at X-T2. Without a reliable 85mm-ish lens i will struggle to do full-body portraits. My current gear has the same problem, as much as i love Tamron 90mm f/2.8 it is too slow to work with and af hunts all the time, whereas 70-200 works just fine.

 

You guys at Fuji don't know how luckily you are with compact-ish 1.4 and 1.2 primes  :D

Edited by Gurcem Eugene Zekai
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Thank your for the reply mate  ^_^

 

I have looked the 3rd party lenses such as Samyang and Mitakon but i might want to get AF lenses  IF i continue to do events/weddings. I am trying to bounce commercial work, hence Ma degree (mostly for networking though).

 

Sad to hear 56mm AF speed is not fast enough, i was expecting it to be usable at X-T2. Without a reliable 85mm-ish lens i will struggle to do full-body portraits. My current gear has the same problem, as much as i love Tamron 90mm f/2.8 it is too slow to work with and af hunts all the time, whereas 70-200 works just fine.

 

You guys at Fuji don't know how luckily you are with compact-ish 1.4 and 1.2 primes  :D

 

Well really you shouldn't be too put off by my word that the 56 is too slow to focus. It's too slow for ME, but I tend to be really demanding of my AF speeds. I complain about the AF speed of Fuji in general on here fairly regularly, and many times someone comes in and disagrees, so it's worth testing for yourself. For comparison, I couldn't use the Canon 85mm f/1.2 L either, because it focused so damned slowly. 

 

And the 50-140 will do you nicely for full body work so long as you aren't demanding wider than f/2.8

 

I understanding wanting AF lenses, especially for event shooting like weddings, but the manual focus aides that you get on the X-T2 are incredible. very difficult to miss focus with them turned on. Even shooting at f/.95 on my Mitakon, I feel very confident in my focusing abilities. So you could always get a 56 and use it normally, or use it as a manual focus lens with the focusing aides, or get an old 55mm f/1.2 from another mount and adapt it and save some money. You have lots of options with Fuji!

 

Attached is a shot I took at f/.95 with my Mitakon. 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest mikEm13

You just have to drink it faster. The fun is taking it out of and putting it in the "holder."

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

 

I agree.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
    • How does one make sure that Fuji's image correction is turned on to correct barrel and pin-cushion distortion on a GFX 100 or GFX100S when using the GF20-35? Is it only applied to the jpegs and not to the raw files? (I was surprised to discover the barrel distortion on the GF 35-70mm lens.) I normally shoot in raw with jpeg back-up and use the raw files, which I convert either in Affinity Photo 2 when editing with that program or in Raw File Converter Ex 3.0 by Silkypix if I wish to process the image in Photoshop CS6. (Adobe DNG is also a possibility.) Thank you for the help. Trevor
×
×
  • Create New...