Jump to content

ON1 Released 2017.0.2 today- Nice X-Trans Improvements

AZWolf

By AZWolf
in RAW Conversion Fuji X Photos

 Share

Recommended Posts

AZWolf Enthusiast

AZWolf

Posted
Posted

Hi All

 

ON1 released 2017.0.2 today for immediate download. It includes much improved raw conversions and support for lossless-compressed. Below is a blurb they sent me with some info about future releases and what they will include. In the meantime enjoy the new release.

 

Blurb from ON1:

 

“ON1 Isn’t Done Yet
ON1 has adopted a new development process with ON1 Photo 2017. This will allow for continuous updates and new features approximately every 4-6 weeks. Several free updates to ON1 Photo are scheduled for the first half of 2017. These include: automatic lens correction, workspaces, compare mode, photo settings, versions, groups (stacks), camera profiles (film looks), updates for new cameras, and much more. Feedback from the ON1 community has been critical in helping prioritize product features. The Photo RAW Project is the best way for users to submit their ideas and feature requests for Photo RAW. Each submission is reviewed by ON1 and then voted on by the community. The more votes an idea gets, the higher likelihood it will get added into the app.”

 

I have a comparison on my blog of this new release of ON1 Photo Raw along with other raw processors. There's also a topic/thread over on X-Pro2 of this forum. I'm working on some more comparisons too.

 

Cheers,

 

Joel

Link to post
Share on other sites
Torturro Enthusiast

Torturro

Posted
Posted

Still - a bit behind Irident - in terms of details. 

Also - it's very slow on my 2013 macbook pro - with 8gb ram :(

and no Fuji colour profiles - as far as I know.

 

other than that - quite nice. Still not sure weather use it on regular basis, because of above.

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites
AZWolf Enthusiast

AZWolf

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

Still - a bit behind Irident - in terms of details. 

Also - it's very slow on my 2013 macbook pro - with 8gb ram :(

and no Fuji colour profiles - as far as I know.

 

other than that - quite nice. Still not sure weather use it on regular basis, because of above.

 

 

Hi Torturro,

 

Thanks for reading my post. Not sure why it is slow on your MacBook. I have a 2014 MacBook with 8GB RAM and it's quite speedy. I don't think there's a significant difference between the 2 model years. Can't explain that one.

 

ON1 says the fuji film profiles are coming this year though not sure when. I agree that detail is slightly better in Iridient. I just find the workflow to be the advantage in Photo Raw. But as we know, ask 2 photographers and get 3 opinions  ;) What ever works best for you and your workflow is the best one to use.

 

Cheers,

Joel

Edited by AZWolf
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Don Barar
      LUT doesn't works on resolve

      By Don Barar · Posted

      Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • crazyfields
      Please save me from insanity 23mm f2 vs F1.4r

      By crazyfields · Posted

      Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
    • George_P
      Please save me from insanity 23mm f2 vs F1.4r

      By George_P · Posted

      I don’t have the 23 f2 but I have read several times that it is considered a little soft at close distance, compared to the 23 f1.4 lenses. These will also focus at shorter distance from the subject, esp. the new one. So that might make a difference. The new 23 f1.4 LM WR  has better resolution, esp. in regard to the 40Mpix sensors, which you don’t have on the X-T2. What practical difference that makes for the value of the pictures one makes is disputable and subjective.  f1.4 will gather more light but with a smaller DOF, which may be desirable in some situations but not so in others, depends. If you like to shoot close ups, you will probably use higher f numbers to get a bigger DOF. Same for landscapes. If you are a bokeh fan, yes the f1.4 lens are better.  The older 23 f1.4 lens that you are considering is a very good and respected lens. The f1.4 vs f2 aperture per se is perhaps not so important. The 23 f2 is very small, light and practical and a great lens for travel and landscapes. So, go figure. I am afraid I just sent you further down the road to insanity !
    • crazyfields
      Please save me from insanity 23mm f2 vs F1.4r

      By crazyfields · Posted

      First post here but long time fuji shorter. I use the XT2 with the 23mm f2 / 35mm 1.4 / 16-80mm f4 I'm considering the 23mm f1.4 r (Non-WR) About me: - I shoot black and white only. - I like macro details to wide open landscapes and everything in-between. - I shoot mostly for art, intrigue and creativity of the image. My question - is the 23mm f1.4 going to offer me any meaningful difference over the f2 for the above scenarios Thanks and sorry for bringing it up again...
    • DavidJohn
      Unmarked government installation

      By DavidJohn · Posted

      I discovered this unmarked government installation today.  

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

×
×
  • Create New...