Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I hope I'm not breaking any forum rules but I'm selling several GFX Lenses.  I have found I shoot more with zooms on my 50r and 100s, and I've also invested in Leica now so two primes, and a zoom have to go.  

SOLD;Fuji GFX 30mm F3.5.   I last used this lens in 2022 on an Alaska trip.  This lens, and my GF100-200 were my MOST USED.  I do love it, but I now own the GF 20-35 F4.  I'm asking 990.00 for it + a few bucks for shipping UPS Ground.  Tomorrow morning I'm putting everything together for some photos.  But I have the caps, lens hood, and the original boxes and paperwork.  I "may" not be able to find the black storage pouches.  

SOLD: The second lens is in my opinion the BEST, and my FAVORITE lens:  The Fuji GF45mm F2.8.  Man, WHAT A LENS!  However, this lens is another that sits in my office pretty much unused.  Last time I used it was in Alaska in 2022, and in Newfoundland in 2023.  I've yet to use it in 2024.  This one will also include caps, lens hood and the box.  Again I do not have the black storage pouch. Price;  990.00 US plus a few bucks for shipping via UPS Ground to be determined.  Again I'll be taking photos tomorrow so if you are interested please let me know.  

SOLD: The third and final lens is the GF32-64 F4.  I'm selling this one for $850.00 US plus some shipping for UPS Ground.  Great Lens!  I use it extensively and have sold 72" x 50" prints from it.  

Please note I can only ship in the CONTINENTAL US.  Sorry.  Here, I'm including a link to my eBay account and my ratings.  I don't BS, I tell it like it is.  These lenses are in absolutely beautiful pristine condition.

I'm on eBay as dallasmorning user name.   Please check me out if you have any doubts.

I only accept PayPal if you are interested.  Also, feel free to make an offer - however I think the prices are already discounted so you may not be successful.

 

Edited by jlmphotos
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • A fungus in the forest.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      (p.s. Open Topic.)  
    • The backslashes you are referring are just symbols denoting path.  Once you import into these LUTS into Davinci Resolve those backslashes are removed by default and you only see is the true file name which has no backslashes.  Convince yourself of this by opening the LUT folder from the Davinci Resolve Project Settings.  Do you see any backslashes in those LUT names? Of course not.  The only name you see is the one that has the underscores and the periods. These LUTS work as designed without having to change any path names.  However, they need to be set up properly through CSTs and by what is supported in Davinci Resolve.  Hence, the FLog2C film simulation LUTS cannot be used because Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut color space and the FLog2C gamut. Alternatively, Davinci Resolve does support Flog2 film simulation LUTS because the color space for FLog2 is Rec 2020 and there is an FLog2 gamut. If all you are doing is changing the path names then you are not getting the correct results.
    • I found the reddit topic i refere to :  https://www.reddit.com/r/davinciresolve/comments/1pc3f1e/cant_apply_new_fujifilm_gfx_55_lut/ "Update for y'all, It's just like what @ExpBalSat said, it's because of the backslashes in the names break them. I changed the file name and it works now. "   For me it was the solution. Realy annoying if it doesn’t work for you 😕  
    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
×
×
  • Create New...