Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A couple of shots taken with the 23mm f2 in the few weeks since I bought it. It's a nice lens for capturing daily life

2ed25cf9a0f53204f2d79b34a380f1e0.jpgc89f427ce6270f0ccc5a447c0172931e.jpg0395e75334240a18ce68e7c3cd030a47.jpg9c072cc8fa40a877a0cefd6eecddaf1e.jpgcf789a67005a3b0d2d3fc811c9f2381c.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Thank you for sharing this. I'm also looking for a prime lens that can replace my kit lens when night came. I can see that this 23mm f2 can really shoot great photo with minimum light.

I'm just still wondering what focal length is best for me 23 or 27 or 35.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the 35, and use it a lot, especially for head-and-shoulders portraits - but I find it too restrictive indoors and in enclosed spaces to have as a do-it-all lens. You can't get enough background in. The 27 is nice too, and small, but the 23 gives you an extra stop of light, an aperture ring and weather resistance. Taken with the 35:632913b3914f73a1ba1df6c5c9ad88dc.jpgd821d59e2825b4c6d1f8ade612e78074.jpg27ac09d32492f180b9249e58908b4508.jpgce455cb7ebafef0a8aa18ee2544fd14a.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Edited by Warwick
Link to post
Share on other sites

It won't. Modern sensors allow you to take pictures in surprisingly dim light - especially with a wide-aperture lens. If you look further up the page there are some might-time/dim light shots I took with the F2 lenses. It really isn't a problem.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by Warwick
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for sharing. I'm wondering if no OIS will get me a blurry image since I'm new with photography.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

As long as you can keep your hands even a little bit steady, you'll be fine without OIS, especially at 23mm focal length. The wider the lens, the slower the shutter speed you can get away with. Just watch your shutter speed in different lighting and situations as you get used to the lens. A very general rule is that you should try to keep your shutter speed at 1/(focal length of the lens in 35mm equivalent). So for the 23mm, you should aim for at least 1/35 second to be safe (that is assuming that your subject is not moving). If it's slower, then open up your aperture a little bit or increase your ISO.

 

I have pretty steady hands, so I've found that I can usually get away with down to 1/20 second using my 23mm. As I get older, that will probably change, but for now I can do it! If I'm running really close to my limit for handheld shots, I'll usually take 2 or 3, which isn't a bad idea anyhow regardless of shutter speed if you think it's a good shot.

 

About 85% of my photos are done with the 23 and 35mm primes and I have zero problems without OIS. You'll be fine once you shoot with it for a little bit and find your own limits for handheld shutter speeds.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...