Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In addition to the bizarre behavior where the X-T2 stops down the lens for the entire time focusing in AF-C, I just noticed a new weird behavior tonight.

 

This affects AF-S mode, and it is very odd indeed.

 

It's most obvious in zone focus mode with the largest PDAF focus area.

 

This is with the 35mm F2.

 

Set the lens to f/2 and try focusing on something close and then something distant. The AF slowly hunts (3 seconds in my tests--about the same as the X-Pro1, so seems to be using CDAF).

 

Now set the lens to f/16 and try it. Boom, focusing now takes less than 1 second.

 

Now, as I mentioned in the other thread, in AF-S mode the X-T2 focuses with the lens wide open (or nearly). This is still true in this case. The lens doesn't actually stop down to f/16 until the focusing is done. But for some bizarre reason, and even though the actual aperture during focusing is f/2ish, it's far quicker with the aperture ring on the lens set to f/16.

 

WTF, Fuji?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This would be due to DOF at the relevant aperture. F/2 has a very narrow field of focus vs f/16 which is basically everything in focus to start with so locks on straight away.

 

Same thing happens with all fast lenses when using them wide open.

 

Sent from my LG-H850 using Tapatalk

 

Are you saying that Fuji's AF algorithm is enabling a faster/lower accuracy focus mode for higher aperture numbers (the speed increases dramatically at f/4 and higher)? Or, conversely, forcing a slower AF mode when the aperture number is lower (than f/4)?

 

If this is necessary, why do you think DSLR manufacturers don't do this (AF speed is consistent no matter the aperture setting on every DSLR I've ever used...)

 

Are you aware of any setting/option to allow users to opt out of this behavior any use the fast AF mode even at f/2?

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE: This behavior seems less consistent in brighter light (in bright light focusing appears to be using the 'fast mode' with the lens set to f/2 most of the time). It's not entirely clear to me what causes the Fuji to fall back on CDAF. Low light is when you need f/2 the most, so it sucks that focus is faster with the lens set to f/4... It's like a choice is between getting a grainy shot at f/4+ or missing the moment entirely at f/2, f2.8 (because the camera takes 3 seconds to focus). 

 

The real disappointment here for me is that in the situations I most often shoot in, the X-T2 is focusing just as slow as the X-Pro1 does.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...