Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I must confess to knowing nothing about focus peaking so I set up my XT2 with peaking in Red - low.

 

With a 35mm f2 lens attached and f2 selected, I noticed that the area shown in Red that is supposed to be in focus was greatly exaggerated when compared to the image viewed on my monitor in photoshop.

 

Also the in focus area highlighted in Red did not change at all when I changed apertures to f16, is this normal? Does it only register Red at the max aperture of the lens?

 

Michael

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Thanks for the reply but mine does not display a greater dof at smaller apertures.

 

I focussed on some lettering on a cereal packet on my table. At f2 or f16 the Red peaking colour does not change at all.

 

If you have an XT2 could you please try that for me.

 

Many thanks

Michael

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have only played with it a little bit (will play with it more when my Rokinon FishEye arrives tomorrow), but have found that it is finicky and takes practice to learn how it works.  I believe the visual marker we see when moving the focus ring indicates the front of the Depth of Field (DoF).  So the part in focus should be (approx) what is immediately behind the indicator.  At least that is what I recall when I used it last.  If you are at a small aperture, then the DoF results will be greater (naturally) but the focus peek indicator is still the same regardless of F-stop.  It would be pretty slick if the focus assist changed with the aperture to give us an area of focus to expect (or illustrate the expected DoF) .. but alas ... do any mirrorless cameras do that currently?  I know the Sony and Lecia have a pretty slick manual focus peeking feature, but I've never used one personally.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Adam,

 

I am confused with this problem.

If the part in focus is immediately behind the indicator, is this the dof wide open or at F16?

When I use the 35mm lens focussed at about 15 feet the area in red extends to infinity.

 

I would be very interested in anything else you can clarify on this subject.

 

The main reasin I wish to use this function is to verify that the focus point selected by the af-l button

in manual focus mode is accurate

 

Regards

Michael

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did a bit of testing this evening.  I found that regardless of the F stop, the focus indicator when in manual focus does not change in size.   So I tested a shot @ F2.8 and F11.  What I found was the focus indicator seems to show where centre of the DoF (or what is in focus) will be.  I shot a piece of paper that had text on it from top to bottom and shot the text in the middle with the camera being approx 45 degrees to the paper.  So the area of focus (or DoF) was very obivous.  And when I shot it at F11, the area in front of and behind the manual focus assist line was pretty evenly in focus.

This help?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Low is supposedly "lower sensitivity" ergo, "tighter" focus indication. High will show "more stuff" in red, but is less precise.

I agree with you that focus peaking on High doesn't seem to make much sense. I've yet to find a use-case for it.

 

As for DOF, once you have you focus selected via peaking, use the DOF preview (I have mine mapped to the front button) to check the depth things in acceptable focus. This's actually works pretty well.

 

Rand

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...