Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have an Xt5 when using a XF 100mm-400mmm lense I have a slight blueish fringe around high contrast edges of the image.  Have I a faulty lens that i need to return to Fuji? I am not sure you will be able to see at this low resolution image.  Thoughts welcome.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bluish fringing is chromatic aberration.

It is a fact of life for photography, especially for high contrasty images taken with zoom lens, and quite often for images taken with zoom lenses set to wide open apertures, maximum or minimum zoom length in high contrasty scenes.

If you have software for processing images, or for converting raw images, look for tools that reduce CA, often called color fringing. With practice you may be able to reduce it to not being noticeable. There are lots and lots of tutorials on the internet about reducing CA.

If you only shoot jpeg images, try stopping the lens aperture down some, or kick the zoom back a little. CA tends to be worse at the edges rather than the frame middle for what that is worth.

Avoiding high contrasty scenes does work, but that is not realistic, so try to get it to the level where you can be happy with the image and do not lose sleep over it.

The CA in the image you posted is not bad at all, you almost have to start pixel peeping, with a little work you can get rid of it, Your lens seems okay, based on this shot.

p.s. Welcome to the forum.

Edited by jerryy
Link to post
Share on other sites

What jerryy said.

Couple more ideas: putting color filters in front of the lens can help. There are "straw" filters that look very pale yellow, which knock out the shortest blue wavelengths without changing most subjective colors much. Maybe somebody also makes a filter that knocks out the longest reds, also without changing colors much.

And, if you can play a little with composition -- I mean, if your subject lends itself to this -- you can orient the edges with the biggest brightness contrast to be radial in your image, rather than circumferential. Chromatic aberration only happens radially with respect to the optical axis (e.g. the photo center if it's not cropped.

I *think* there are many optical systems that are achromatic, specifically being corrected for two widely spaced wavelengths, that will tend to have green versus purple (red + blue) fringes. Picture a graph of the effective focal length as a function of wavelength, and these systems will be a smile or a frown. For some purposes (such as astrophotography) you can get much fancier and more costly optical systems that are apochromatic, corrected for three wavelengths, whose graph will slope up-down-up or down-up-down. Going beyond that, systems based entirely on mirrors have no chromatic aberration. I guess -- don't know this for sure -- that camera lenses using both mirrors and refraction, catadioptric lenses, could have less chromatic aberration than lenses without mirrors. These are generally fixed focal length, fixed aperture lenses. There are some 3rd party ones available for Fuji X, though I don't remember seeing any that are autofocus.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup, catadioptric lenses wipe out CA from your images, they have a few drawbacks; the design means they start off at telephoto focal lengths with fixed apertures and there is a teeny tiny “hole” in the image middle (this is not a big issue, it is usually never noticeable, but it is there). They also tend to be a little heavy and occasionally need adjusting to keep the mirror part collimated. They give you pretty good images.

As I recall, Minolta made a catadioptric lens that could auto focus, this was taken over by Sony who still makes the lens for one of their bodies, but no one else makes one. There are several manual focus ones for Fujilfilm’s X-mount bodies.

Achromatic lenses do remove red-blue fringing, you can often find these types in those screw on macro-diopter lenses or in old box landscape cameras. But they have a problem with green fringing as it is not corrected at all.

To get all three fringings, red-blue-green, folks have shifted over to Apochromatic designs. These are found in high end telephoto camera lenses and more often in refractor telescopes — the triplet design. They currently tend to be expensive.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Which direction is the light source coming from in the dark images? For example, if it coming from behind the subject, a common occurrence known as backlighting, put some light from the front toward the subject — you can do this with a flash unit, or by using various types of colored reflectors. Or, use long exposures with various grades and types of graduated neutral density filters to bring out the dark areas without blowing out the highlights. Or try bracketing exposures. There is a technique called ETTR, expose to the right, which will bring out shadow detail but risks blowing out the brighter sections. This may help in understanding DR settings as well as Dynamic Range Priority: https://www.jmpeltier.com/fujifilm-dynamic-range-settings/ p.s. The situation you are describing has been one photographers have struggled against since cameras and photographers have been around.  
    • Hi, I'm looking for some Fujifilm HDR RAF image samples from the X-T4, X-Pro3 or X100V cameras. These cameras should store 3 RAW images inside the RAF image file in HDR mode. In need it, to verify my own software, but don't find any downloadable samples on web. Can someone help? Christoph
    • I would like to get your comments on the following problem of mine: Occasionally, I do get too dark JPG pictures with X-T50 - when the scene is contrasty; I think this is the very situation. This can happen when sun shines from a blue sky or the sky is cloudy but still very bright. I find these outcomes strange, as in many other (more or less similar) situations I find that the exposure is balanced. Is there any remedy for this, as I cannot completely figure out as to why this happens. Photometry is at the most common center-weight setting. What factors/settings can affect the picture's exposure in X-T50 (in the situation I describe)? For JPGs I've set the dynamic range on (DR400 with ISO500). Can that do it?? I thought it balances contrasts... Well, I can adjust the exposure on a computer but that is extra work for holiday pictures.
    • Like Jerryy says you can scale you image down so that it can be uploaded - that way we aren't guessing. The only symbol that looks like a camera is the Continuous Mode symbol - but it normally has "L" or "H" next to it rather than a "1"
    • Welcome to the forum. I think the icon that looks like a camera you are mentioning could be the metering mode icon: https://fujifilm-dsc.com/en-int/manual/x-t4/about_this_camera/display/index.html (Number 39 or 41 depending on whether you are looking at the viewfinder screen or the lcd screen.) Have you customized any display settings? That would affect what you get to see on the displays. Akso, if you have Large Indicator Mode turned on, the M or P will not show: https://fujifilm-dsc.com/en-int/manual/x-t4/menu_setup/screen_set-up/index.html p.s. If you have an image editor, you can scale your images to a smaller size that can be uploaded.
×
×
  • Create New...