Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am going to Monterey whale watching in feb
 

which lenses is perfect for whale watching 

my options for now is

50-140mm 70-300mm 1.4 tele

 

i am thinking about buy tamron 18-300mm so i can carrying only 1 lenses with all focal length 

and how about setting in xt5

thank you very much 

 

 

 

Edited by PingPingPing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the forum.

Unless the boat gets very close to the whales, wider angle lenses probably will not be all that useful. For the choices you listed, that 70 - 300 mm gets a lot of good reviews and as you note, can be used with the 1.4x tc. Do you think you may be able to get the 100-400mm or the 150-600mm in the near future (assuming good weather and bright skies)?

Another option is to rent or borrow another body, put a wider angle lens on it and keep it close by while you use the longer lens. Then, if you want some landscape style shots or the whales do get close, you have it ready to go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A friend is an avid bird watcher and we once had a discussion as why binoculars for birding were so expensive. She explained that not only did the noc's need reach, they needed a broad enough field of view that allowed you to find bird quickly. The same is true for tracking whales, by the time one puts their eye to the view finder or screen and locate the whale, it could be gone, so you frequently are observing through the camera.

The idea of the Tamron is a good one, you can use the wide angle to locate and then zoom in. For what it's worth, I'd try manual focus and set the focus at infinity, then zoom in and out. I'd also try and maintain a deep depth of field, but be cognizant of shutter speed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are quite a few considerations. Birders will often use 6 x mm or 8 x mm binoculars over others because they are “bright” and lightweight. Bright lets you see things quickly in the same way a f1.4 lens will before a f8 lens does. Lightweight is obvious.

Tamron’s superzoom is supposed to be a good lens according to the reviewers, but it is not parfocal. You will have to re-focus every time you do any zooming.

@PingPingPing says they are going to Monterey, which I am guessing is the one in the U.S. which means since whales are a protected species, the tour may not be getting close to the critters swimming out there. Various laws restrict and/or prohibit boats’ activities. So essentially, longer lenses will help more than shorter ones.

Nikon has a nice explanation: https://www.nikonusa.com/en/learn-and-explore/a/tips-and-techniques/tips-for-taking-great-whale-and-dolphin-photos.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...