Jump to content

Fuji X-A1 for Astrophotos

TomS
 Share

Recommended Posts

TomS Newbie

TomS

Posted
Posted (edited)

Hi there, I'm Thomas from Darmstadt, Germany. I got me an old x-a1 because of the good reviews concerning sensor noise. I recently tried to use it for astrophotography and was facing two major problems. 1. the ISO setting did not affect the picture on the display, means I could not see stars at all and could consequently not do focusing with Bahtinov mask. My Sony Nex-3N even allows a 'live view' (when saving in jpg format) to zoom in on the stars while doing the focusing. Stars (and noise) become brighter at higher ISO values as expected, why not so on th Fuji? 2. I solved this problem by taking many pictures, zooming in on the saved images, but the camera seems to have a maximum zoom factor for saved images which is not very high. So even in this quite cumbersome way I could not see sufficiently big Bahtinov patterns. 

Since I have the camera only since few weeks it is absolutely not excluded that the mistake is on my side (yes, I read the manual). If not, I would say it is definitely not usable for astrophotography. 

Edited by TomS
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • TomS changed the title to Fuji X-A1 for Astrophotos
jerryy Grand Master

jerryy

Posted
Posted (edited)

Wow, that is an old Bayer sensor range-finder type camera.

Range-finder cameras are not the best for astro-photography, but you may be able to get it working. Do you have a smart phone or tablet?

Try using the Fujifilm Camera Remote app to use the A1’s wifi to transfer a shot over to your phone/tablet which should let you zoom in further than the lcd will. This method requires some patience to get it to work, but once you do, it gives usable results.

https://app.fujifilm-dsc.com/en/manual/camera_remote/usage/live_view/index.html

If you do not get results you like, or as an alternative, The X-A1 has a USB port which you can use to upload images to a “cheap” laptop and zoom in as far as the laptop’s software will let you. Again, patience, patience and practice.

I use a version of these for plate-solving and focus checking with more recently made cameras. I hope you are able to make something work.

p.s. Welcome to the forum.

Edited by jerryy
Link to post
Share on other sites
jerryy Grand Master

jerryy

Posted
Posted (edited)

There is an alternative that may help. During the day time, take your gear to a place where you can sort of see things far, far, far away in the distance. Get a couple of shots focused on that object. Make a mark on the “focuser”, (you did not say whether you are using a camera lens or a telescope). Then at night, take a bunch of shots focused at that mark. Move the focuser one notch below the mark and get a bunch more shots. Move the focuser to one notch above the mark and take more shots. Move these over to your computer and see which set gives you round, small stars. If it is the set from the mark, you are pretty much good to go, during regular sessions, focus at the mark and get lots of good images. One thing to keep in mind, if the temperature changes several degrees, or you are aiming 60 degrees (or more) above the horizon, you may get focus breathing, so check now and then.

Edited by jerryy
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 10 months later...
e-light Newbie

e-light

Posted
Posted

Car Top 10 selftimer 15 sec @f2  fuji X-A1 Zonlai 22mm F1.8  crop

Yes, a mechanic old school Objectiv is easyer to get to infinity

The X-A1 is astro as yous ee easy the M42

Shooting without optic AND do this SAVE  like in C

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • thelostkiwi
      Looking for Full Frame lenses to adapt to GFX

      By thelostkiwi · Posted

      I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Trevor R
      Image correction with GF20-35

      By Trevor R · Posted

      Thank you. I will research it.
    • jerryy
      Image correction with GF20-35

      By jerryy · Posted

      Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Trevor R
      Image correction with GF20-35

      By Trevor R · Posted

      Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • jerryy
      Image correction with GF20-35

      By jerryy · Posted

      Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...