Jump to content

Is it worth sacrificing the better-build XT3 for an XT30ii?

Fathom Fuji

By Fathom Fuji
in Fuji X-T3 / Fuji X-T30

 Share

Recommended Posts

Fathom Fuji Newbie

Fathom Fuji

Posted
Posted

Hi! Currently, I have an X-T3 but since getting an X100v and using its built-in Classic Neg film sim which simulated near identical film-like emulations from the 80s and 90s, I'm contemplating on selling/trading-in of my X-T3 for an X-T30ii. Why?

***So the two main reasons why I may plunge for the X-T30ii would be:

#1 Classic Negative Film Sim
#2 More compact form factor
NOTE: I know that you can incorporate Classic Neg on XT3 raw files either thru Capture One's or Lightroom's Fuji Color Profiles but it just doesn't render the same color palette coming from XTrans4 processors from bodies 2019 and up.

***What's holding me back in biting the bullet? Even though today I can sell the X-T3 at its price when I bought it new due to the demand:

#1--My XT3 had been virtually trouble-free. Except for very rare instances that it froze (2-3x), it didn't give me problems. Version 1 X-T30's were known to have the so-called failure of the front dial command over time AND who can ever forget, that Q button position which irritated many. I also read from a Facebook group that XT30 mk1 and mk2 units may have rubber peeling issues over time.

#2--XT3's weather sealing built. Even though I don't live in harsh environments, weather sealing is vital (though overrated for some) so that I wouldn't have to think about it should I travel abroad and be subjected to windy, dusty environments. Also, I don't have any clue as to what extent the XT30ii's robustness is. Maybe someone can help me here by commenting. Also, would all my lenses being weather sealed be helpful given XT30ii being non-WR?

#3--Value. For certain, the X-T3 holds more value than the X-T30ii since it's a higher tier model. Performance-wise, it's also better in low light (as reviewers are claiming). Also, the resale value could be higher over time.

***I just do street, travel, food, family documentary images.

***Also, I think I can sell the X-T3 at the same price I bought it over two years ago which will cover the price of a brand new X-T30ii in case.

***Since I received my X100v, I'm finding the XT3 being used much less so "maybe" using a more compact body and having that classic neg film sim may motivate me more.

***Hoping I could get the community's thoughts on this matter as I don't want to feel regretful whatever decision I make. Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • PoorAlchemist
      LUT doesn't works on resolve

      By PoorAlchemist · Posted

      I found the reddit topic i refere to :  https://www.reddit.com/r/davinciresolve/comments/1pc3f1e/cant_apply_new_fujifilm_gfx_55_lut/ "Update for y'all, It's just like what @ExpBalSat said, it's because of the backslashes in the names break them. I changed the file name and it works now. "   For me it was the solution. Realy annoying if it doesn’t work for you 😕  
    • Don Barar
      LUT doesn't works on resolve

      By Don Barar · Posted

      Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • crazyfields
      Please save me from insanity 23mm f2 vs F1.4r

      By crazyfields · Posted

      Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
    • George_P
      Please save me from insanity 23mm f2 vs F1.4r

      By George_P · Posted

      I don’t have the 23 f2 but I have read several times that it is considered a little soft at close distance, compared to the 23 f1.4 lenses. These will also focus at shorter distance from the subject, esp. the new one. So that might make a difference. The new 23 f1.4 LM WR  has better resolution, esp. in regard to the 40Mpix sensors, which you don’t have on the X-T2. What practical difference that makes for the value of the pictures one makes is disputable and subjective.  f1.4 will gather more light but with a smaller DOF, which may be desirable in some situations but not so in others, depends. If you like to shoot close ups, you will probably use higher f numbers to get a bigger DOF. Same for landscapes. If you are a bokeh fan, yes the f1.4 lens are better.  The older 23 f1.4 lens that you are considering is a very good and respected lens. The f1.4 vs f2 aperture per se is perhaps not so important. The 23 f2 is very small, light and practical and a great lens for travel and landscapes. So, go figure. I am afraid I just sent you further down the road to insanity !
    • crazyfields
      Please save me from insanity 23mm f2 vs F1.4r

      By crazyfields · Posted

      First post here but long time fuji shorter. I use the XT2 with the 23mm f2 / 35mm 1.4 / 16-80mm f4 I'm considering the 23mm f1.4 r (Non-WR) About me: - I shoot black and white only. - I like macro details to wide open landscapes and everything in-between. - I shoot mostly for art, intrigue and creativity of the image. My question - is the 23mm f1.4 going to offer me any meaningful difference over the f2 for the above scenarios Thanks and sorry for bringing it up again...
×
×
  • Create New...