Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Which ND filter would be ideal to shoot against the sun with the reflector being the fill light on an xt-1 ? 

Provided the aperture is fixed wide open at 2.8 (18-55).

I only have the small flash provided with the kit at the moment.

 

Yes I want a prime lens and a good flash system but I cant afford those for a few months. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I use Rodenstock ND with great effect on my xf56.

 

I was also thinking about trying this variable ND, purely for "one filter for all" during travel.

 

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/936135-REG/rodenstock_605890_58mm_digital_vario_nd.html

 

Rodenstock's uv filter is by far the most "effective" (cost considered as well) of others I've tried.

 

I hear good reviews about Singh-Ray and Lee but be prepared to pay. There are a great many brands all with their own "characteristics".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, that's why I haven't pulled the trigger on the VND yet.

 

Apart from the 3x neutral ND which came with my lens, I use the 4x and 8x Rodenstock HR Digital ND. The Fujifilm 3x or Rodenstock 4x are very versatile and probably the best for outdoor portrait. The 8x is good for strob + motion blurr kinda photography....or just to blur out moving water, etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you still need the flash if you've got the reflector in play? If not, you could just use the electric shutter to get a super high shutter speed for a wide aperture shot.

 

As for a good quality flash system, outside of studio setups we're not particularly blessed as Fuji users!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes but I don't think they'd impact portraits. Eg not good for fast moving items due to rolling shutter and some artificial lighting creates a banding effect. Neither of which should be a problem for you in the scenario you discuss.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Nissin i40 works very well. LumoPro LP180 for manual strobes offsite and a beauty dish/soft box works wonders. ;)

 

Havent really tried FLASH systems but on a shoot when the sun is behind the model (to prevent squinchin of eyes), will it be bright enough to light up the mode's face n body ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Havent really tried FLASH systems but on a shoot when the sun is behind the model (to prevent squinchin of eyes), will it be bright enough to light up the mode's face n body ?

More than enough. I've had to turn down the power.

 

I was on 18, 35 and 56mm back lit. No issue. If you want more power, you may want to wait for the Nissin i60 or Fujifilm's ef-x500. The latter is big...

 

I've never needed more power shooting bounce or direct.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Nissin works okay, but its only real selling point is it supports TTL metering, which no other flash currently does with Fuji. However, it's also very small, the light quality from it isn't terribly great, and there's limited control. It's a big step-up from the little flash you get for the X-T1, but if you're trying to equal out midday sun, forget it.

A larger, simple flash unit like Neewer or Yongnuo flashes will work for this purpose better, as they are simply bigger and have more light output, but they only have basic manual control. Cactus flashes give even more light output and have lots of fancier features—remote zoom control, customisable delay timer, an update soon for HSS, etc—but they're still a manual control flash, on Fuji.

Anyway, bearing in mind that ND filters are a bit irrelevant for portraits without flash...

What ND filter you use varies depending on the day, the size and proximity of the reflector, and what shutter and ISO you want to use. (And aperture, but you've already said you're looking at f/2.8.)
I carry 1-stop, 2-stop, and 4-stop ND filters with me. That way I can cut any amount of light from 1 to 7 stops by adding the filters together. I use Hoya Pro ND filters. They've no noticable colour cast and are even right across the frame. They do reflect the inside of the lens barrel, though, so a a tip is to draw over the white writing on your lens with a black pen. (Look on the front of the lens, you'll see what I mean.)

On an average bright day, I'll mostly use 3- or 4-stops of ND to get the light low enough to use something like f/2.8 with ISO 200, 1/125th*, a white reflector, and a Cactus flash on quarter power. On really bright days with absolutely direct sunlight on the subject, or reflected sunlight on them with a silver reflector, I'll use 5-stops; 6-stops would give a 'proper' exposure, but I like my bright sunny pictures to look bright and sunny, so I let them over expose very slightly.

 

There's no one single ND filter I'd recommend to start out with. It's really best to get at least two. A 2-stop and 3- or 4-stop would be a good pair. Then add a 1-stop once you're used to working with combining filters, reflected light, and flash. 'Course nothing stopping you from buying all three at once, if you can afford it. Point is, there's no one grade of ND which will definitely be right, and variable ND filters should definitely be avoided.


*I use 1/125th because that's pretty much the minimum sync speed that all cameras and lights can use, from the cheapest and oldest small units to big modern studio power packs. By sticking to 1/125th I can forget about matching sync speed when I use different systems, and it's just one less thing to think about. This does require a little more ND for flash in strong direct/reflected daylight, though. You could use a stop less of ND and just increase the shutter to 1/180th, the X-T1's maximum, and accept a tiny bit of over exposure, or you could go up to 1/250th. Fuji don't officially support 1/250th on the X-T1, but some people report using it without problems.

Link to post
Share on other sites

More than enough. I've had to turn down the power.

 

I was on 18, 35 and 56mm back lit. No issue. If you want more power, you may want to wait for the Nissin i60 or Fujifilm's ef-x500. The latter is big...

 

I've never needed more power shooting bounce or direct.

The EF-X500 is a high-end, weather-sealed model with a guide number of 50m at ISO 100, the 
ability to control up to three sets of TTL off-camera strobes, and a high-speed sync mode that 
supports the X-Pro2's maximum 1/8000 sec shutter speed. The zoom head range is 24-105mm equiv.,
 and can go as wide as 20mm with the wide panel pulled into place. 

i am really interested in the ef x500 but just realized it hasnt been released as of yet. one question though; 

XPRO 2 specs   Mechanical Shutter 4 sec. to 1/8000 sec.(P mode), 30 sec. to 1/8000 sec.(All modes)

Bulb mode(up to 60 min), TIME : 30 sec. to 1/8000 sec. Electronic Shutter*3 1 sec. to 1/32000 sec.(P / A / S / M modes)

Bulb mode : 1 sec. fixed, TIME : 1 sec to 1/32000sec Mechanical + Electronic Shutter 4 sec. to 1/32000 sec.(P mode), 30 sec. to 1/32000 sec.(All modes)

Bulb mode(up to 60 min), TIME : 30 sec. to 1/32000 sec. Synchronized shutter speed for flash 1/250 sec. or slower  

 

QUESTION: IF this flash supports xpro2's 1/8000 HSS (MS )then technically it would work too on XT1's 1/4000 (MS)  ?

 

The Nissin works okay, but its only real selling point is it supports TTL metering, which no other flash currently does with Fuji. However, it's also very small, the light quality from it isn't terribly great, and there's limited control. It's a big step-up from the little flash you get for the X-T1, but if you're trying to equal out midday sun, forget it.

A larger, simple flash unit like Neewer or Yongnuo flashes will work for this purpose better, as they are simply bigger and have more light output, but they only have basic manual control. Cactus flashes give even more light output and have lots of fancier features—remote zoom control, customisable delay timer, an update soon for HSS, etc—but they're still a manual control flash, on Fuji.

 

Anyway, bearing in mind that ND filters are a bit irrelevant for portraits without flash...

 

What ND filter you use varies depending on the day, the size and proximity of the reflector, and what shutter and ISO you want to use. (And aperture, but you've already said you're looking at f/2.8.)

I carry 1-stop, 2-stop, and 4-stop ND filters with me. That way I can cut any amount of light from 1 to 7 stops by adding the filters together. I use Hoya Pro ND filters. They've no noticable colour cast and are even right across the frame. They do reflect the inside of the lens barrel, though, so a a tip is to draw over the white writing on your lens with a black pen. (Look on the front of the lens, you'll see what I mean.)

On an average bright day, I'll mostly use 3- or 4-stops of ND to get the light low enough to use something like f/2.8 with ISO 200, 1/125th*, a white reflector, and a Cactus flash on quarter power. On really bright days with absolutely direct sunlight on the subject, or reflected sunlight on them with a silver reflector, I'll use 5-stops; 6-stops would give a 'proper' exposure, but I like my bright sunny pictures to look bright and sunny, so I let them over expose very slightly.

 

There's no one single ND filter I'd recommend to start out with. It's really best to get at least two. A 2-stop and 3- or 4-stop would be a good pair. Then add a 1-stop once you're used to working with combining filters, reflected light, and flash. 'Course nothing stopping you from buying all three at once, if you can afford it. Point is, there's no one grade of ND which will definitely be right, and variable ND filters should definitely be avoided.

*I use 1/125th because that's pretty much the minimum sync speed that all cameras and lights can use, from the cheapest and oldest small units to big modern studio power packs. By sticking to 1/125th I can forget about matching sync speed when I use different systems, and it's just one less thing to think about. This does require a little more ND for flash in strong direct/reflected daylight, though. You could use a stop less of ND and just increase the shutter to 1/180th, the X-T1's maximum, and accept a tiny bit of over exposure, or you could go up to 1/250th. Fuji don't officially support 1/250th on the X-T1, but some people report using it without problems.

 

The cactus is getting a HSS update ?

Edited by rwker
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

The cactus is getting a HSS update ?

 

 

 

Yes. The V6 mark II Transceiver ('V6 mark II S', for Sony systems) will be released "summer 2016"—they've not given a specific date yet—and that includes:

 

- HSS (assuming the flash and camera used with it support HSS; it can't force HSS out of a non-HSS flash.)

- Automatic detection of flash model (no more need to tell it which kind of flash you're using, it will just know.)

- Sharper blue display light instead of the industry standard orange display. Not a big deal, but it's nice to have.

 

Existing Cactus RF60 flashes will need a firmware update to use HSS. RF60 flashes made after the release of the V6 mk II will have that firmware right out of the box.

Existing V6 triggers will also have a firmware update to recieve the HSS signal. However, they will not be able to send an HSS signal. So you could use older V6 triggers on the flash itself, and a V6 mk II on the camera, but not the other way around; the V6 mk II has to be the one on the camera. Of course the Cactus RF60 flashes have the reciever built-in, so if you use their flashes then one V6 mk II trigger will be all you need.

 

If you're willing to wait another couple of months for the Cactus system to be updated, and you have/can save up the money for it, the Cactus system is basically the best flash system for Fuji. TTL is the only thing it misses. It is a fair bit more expensive than the Neewer/Yongnuo flash systems, though. There's no point buying Cactus flashes if it eats up all your money. You'll get better results with two or three Yongnuo flashes than with one Cactus flash.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I found the reddit topic i refere to :  https://www.reddit.com/r/davinciresolve/comments/1pc3f1e/cant_apply_new_fujifilm_gfx_55_lut/ "Update for y'all, It's just like what @ExpBalSat said, it's because of the backslashes in the names break them. I changed the file name and it works now. "   For me it was the solution. Realy annoying if it doesn’t work for you 😕  
    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
    • I don’t have the 23 f2 but I have read several times that it is considered a little soft at close distance, compared to the 23 f1.4 lenses. These will also focus at shorter distance from the subject, esp. the new one. So that might make a difference. The new 23 f1.4 LM WR  has better resolution, esp. in regard to the 40Mpix sensors, which you don’t have on the X-T2. What practical difference that makes for the value of the pictures one makes is disputable and subjective.  f1.4 will gather more light but with a smaller DOF, which may be desirable in some situations but not so in others, depends. If you like to shoot close ups, you will probably use higher f numbers to get a bigger DOF. Same for landscapes. If you are a bokeh fan, yes the f1.4 lens are better.  The older 23 f1.4 lens that you are considering is a very good and respected lens. The f1.4 vs f2 aperture per se is perhaps not so important. The 23 f2 is very small, light and practical and a great lens for travel and landscapes. So, go figure. I am afraid I just sent you further down the road to insanity !
    • First post here but long time fuji shorter. I use the XT2 with the 23mm f2 / 35mm 1.4 / 16-80mm f4 I'm considering the 23mm f1.4 r (Non-WR) About me: - I shoot black and white only. - I like macro details to wide open landscapes and everything in-between. - I shoot mostly for art, intrigue and creativity of the image. My question - is the 23mm f1.4 going to offer me any meaningful difference over the f2 for the above scenarios Thanks and sorry for bringing it up again...
×
×
  • Create New...