Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Using the new 35/2 on my X-T10, I noticed this issue (watch the ball distortion). Can somebody explain this? Just to know, X-T10 was in mechanical shutter 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very high shutter speed maybe? Ball moving upwards, very narrow shutter slit moving downwards, ball gets compressed. maybe. Very high shutter speeds are like line-scanning where the whole frame overall is still captured at the flash-sync speed (close to 1/250th of a second with older Fujifilm cameras, 1/250th of a second with the X-Pro 2).

There are two ways of getting rid of it: Using a camera with a leaf shutter (X100 series, for example), or a highspeed flash.

 

/edit: or using a slower shutter speed and accepting some motion blur.

Edited by quincy
Link to post
Share on other sites

Question, are you certain the ball wasn't physically distorted when the picture was taken ?

 

It would seems weird that only the ball would be distorted but nothing else around it.

The boy's leg on the background are fairly straight, and I couldn't see anything weird about the girl's fingers either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys thanks for your notes, look at this now

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a photo taken with electronic shutter, so we probably have to face rolling shutter issue

But what about previous two? I should note that I put the lens on another body X-T10 and did not appear the phenomenon!

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I remember correctly, that is the default shutter after one of the FW 4.x update.

 

The second shots look a lot like a Rolling Shutter effect from Electronic shutter, the third shot is a bit inconclusive to me, it seems that the shot was just taken skewed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even mechanical shutter is rolling, at a speed of 1/180 s (as opposed to electronic shutter which is rolling at a speed of 1/15 s).

 

When shutter speed is (say) 1/2000 s, the first curtain is released and it will take 1/180 s to reach the other end. 1/2000 s after the first curtain is released, the second curtain is released, and now there is a slit that travels at a constant speed, taking 1/180 s to complete, but as the curtains are pretty close, any part of the image is exposed for 1/2000 s (time from first to second curtain passing a given point on the sensor).

 

If a ball is moving during exposure, it will be distorted. As shutter is travelling bottom to top, and the lens projects the image upside down, the travel direction of shutter on the image when it is upright is top to bottom. If a ball is travelling downwards, it will be stretched vertically as it travels in the same direction as the shutter. If the ball is travelling upwards, it will be squished as it travels in the opposite direction. If the ball is travelling horizontally, it will be stretched diagonally, as shutter slit moves across the frame (because the ball also travels, but horizontally).

 

Interestingly, the electronic shutter reads sensor top to bottom, and the direction of distortion will be reversed from the one with mechanical shutter. If camera is panned left to right, vertical structures lean to the right with electronic shutter, and to the left (but 12x less so) with mechanical shutter.

 

This has always been the case with any focal plane shutter.

 

Distortion of moving objects is less visible if mechanical shutter is used, since it is 12x faster than electronic shutter, but if the object is moving fast enough across the frame, it will still show to some extent.

 

The easiest way to show this is to pan the camera horizontally when taking a picture of a vertical object (such as a street light post). If camera is panned fast enough, even at 1/4000 s it will still show the distortion.

Edited by vladand
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...