Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

0bb9063150dee3fcf0358eafbad1175b.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

A few thoughts:

  • Posting your before and after photos is unnecessary.  Most of them aren't different enough from the original (in these small web JPGs, at least) to mean much to anyone but you. Show us your final vision.  I will say this small bit about post-processing, though... If you're presenting these as a set or a "portfolio" of Shoreditch you'll be well served to have a consistent look about them.  The "Barber & Parlour" shot, for instance, is vastly different from the rest and seems really out of place.  Was there some reason for the heavy processing in that shot?  Does it feel more like Shoreditch to you?  Is that processing helping to convey your meaning or the feeling of the place?  Would it be appropriate to use that on all of the photos in this set?
  • I find the photos to generally be lacking a subject or focus.  My eye doesn't know where to look in many of the shots.  The "Gap" shot, for instance... what is this showing me?  I do like the graphic element of the line of signs, but the one closest to us is out of focus and the others are shrouded behind it, so are unreadable.  My eye is left to wander about trying to land on some information, moment, or aspect of Shoreditch that you are trying to portray. If you had perhaps moved a bit to your left, this could act as leading lines to the lady in the middle.  Similar for the shot of the man standing at the traffic light.  What are you showing us with this photo (and the others)?
  • The composition of the vertical photos are all very similar with a hard vertical line down the "third" point of the frame - the store signs in the gap photo, the traffic light, the line of buildings in the "Calvert" photo and the columns in the Grocer billboard photo.  It may be interesting to present these as a triptych or some other set to show a theme in your composition.  But be careful in that applying the same composition every time can become boring very quickly for the viewer.  We don't have the same experience of the photo as you (with the sounds, smells, action, etc.), so you need to engage us visually.  Mix things up.  For example, the rows of shops themselves may be more interesting than the long empty sidewalk stretching out beside them - make them your subject.  The food truck shots are simply centered "whole" shots of the trailer/truck - fine as information ("Here's a food truck"), but not terribly engaging for the viewer.  Show us why we might want to go there, or that other people do.  (Though, I'd be very curious to try what they've got at the Duck Truck, which, ironically, isn't a truck.)  Take some time to reflect on each of them individually and as a group - Does this single photo work on its own?  What is the subject here? Does it build upon the last one or few to tell a story or give a sense of being there? etc.
  • With all that said, though, you've passed the first hurdles - getting out there and making the shots and then opening yourself up to random strangers on the internet (savages, we are).  Neither of which can be easy to do.  I get the feeling you were trying to convey a sense of being in Shoreditch - a documentation of some elements of life there: rows of interesting shops (leaving aside the Gap, perhaps), people about, some food truck culture, some common elements of graffiti and a clever sign writer.  That's just my impression, at least, from these first photos.  
Link to post
Share on other sites

A few thoughts:

  • Posting your before and after photos is unnecessary. Most of them aren't different enough from the original (in these small web JPGs, at least) to mean much to anyone but you. Show us your final vision. I will say this small bit about post-processing, though... If you're presenting these as a set or a "portfolio" of Shoreditch you'll be well served to have a consistent look about them. The "Barber & Parlour" shot, for instance, is vastly different from the rest and seems really out of place. Was there some reason for the heavy processing in that shot? Does it feel more like Shoreditch to you? Is that processing helping to convey your meaning or the feeling of the place? Would it be appropriate to use that on all of the photos in this set?
  • I find the photos to generally be lacking a subject or focus. My eye doesn't know where to look in many of the shots. The "Gap" shot, for instance... what is this showing me? I do like the graphic element of the line of signs, but the one closest to us is out of focus and the others are shrouded behind it, so are unreadable. My eye is left to wander about trying to land on some information, moment, or aspect of Shoreditch that you are trying to portray. If you had perhaps moved a bit to your left, this could act as leading lines to the lady in the middle. Similar for the shot of the man standing at the traffic light. What are you showing us with this photo (and the others)?
  • The composition of the vertical photos are all very similar with a hard vertical line down the "third" point of the frame - the store signs in the gap photo, the traffic light, the line of buildings in the "Calvert" photo and the columns in the Grocer billboard photo. It may be interesting to present these as a triptych or some other set to show a theme in your composition. But be careful in that applying the same composition every time can become boring very quickly for the viewer. We don't have the same experience of the photo as you (with the sounds, smells, action, etc.), so you need to engage us visually. Mix things up. For example, the rows of shops themselves may be more interesting than the long empty sidewalk stretching out beside them - make them your subject. The food truck shots are simply centered "whole" shots of the trailer/truck - fine as information ("Here's a food truck"), but not terribly engaging for the viewer. Show us why we might want to go there, or that other people do. (Though, I'd be very curious to try what they've got at the Duck Truck, which, ironically, isn't a truck.) Take some time to reflect on each of them individually and as a group - Does this single photo work on its own? What is the subject here? Does it build upon the last one or few to tell a story or give a sense of being there? etc.
  • With all that said, though, you've passed the first hurdles - getting out there and making the shots and then opening yourself up to random strangers on the internet (savages, we are). Neither of which can be easy to do. I get the feeling you were trying to convey a sense of being in Shoreditch - a documentation of some elements of life there: rows of interesting shops (leaving aside the Gap, perhaps), people about, some food truck culture, some common elements of graffiti and a clever sign writer. That's just my impression, at least, from these first photos.

Thank you, so far I've had some positive comments but the feedback you have provided is what I was looking for!

 

I am half tempted to get back to the same locations to take those shots again and think about composition, but really on my next walk about I will thinking about those points above.

 

Thank you once again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...