Jump to content

Cheap but tough bag for camera and a few accessories


Recommended Posts

Guest thiswayup

http://www.armysurplusandtoys.com/s6-pouch-gas-mask-respirator-p/s6-bag-used.htm

 

This is a British S6 gas mask bag. The fabric on this one is rubberised (that's not true of all S6 bags, so check) and the flap provides semi-ok rain protection over the sides.

AAAGAS-199-2.jpg

 

20 cm wide
12 cm deep
23 cm height
approx
 
I usually insert a plastic food container with a water tight seal into bags I use this way. I pad the container with bubble wrap, duct taped in place, and add a little more bubble wrap between the container and the back of the bag for comfort. Short of a peli case, this is the best protection for a camera I know and it's much lighter than a peli and the camera is easier to get at. Less paranoid types could use a dry bag as a liner instead.
 
The strap hooks on metal D-rings at the back of the bag so it's easy to change (I'm going for an Optek/Bihn.) There's also a lchannel that will take a belt so the bag will work as a waist pack.
 
There are a few small interior pockets that will work to hold power cells and what have you, and the bag would probably hold a telephoto zoom and flash even with the food container in place for the camera.
 
Mine cost me about $10 and I 've seen the same bag on US websites. You can easily find a larger rubberised French gas mask bag and a smaller handbag-shaped Swiss one, all in plain green. If you're ok with camo then even more options are available like the modern UK "Osprey" gasmask bag. Or of you're of the hipster persuasion or an Indianna Jones fan, there are lots of East European canvas gasmasks bags available - although I don't think any offer the security of the deep and narrow design of the S6 bag.
 
 
 
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • A fungus in the forest.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      (p.s. Open Topic.)  
    • The backslashes you are referring are just symbols denoting path.  Once you import into these LUTS into Davinci Resolve those backslashes are removed by default and you only see is the true file name which has no backslashes.  Convince yourself of this by opening the LUT folder from the Davinci Resolve Project Settings.  Do you see any backslashes in those LUT names? Of course not.  The only name you see is the one that has the underscores and the periods. These LUTS work as designed without having to change any path names.  However, they need to be set up properly through CSTs and by what is supported in Davinci Resolve.  Hence, the FLog2C film simulation LUTS cannot be used because Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut color space and the FLog2C gamut. Alternatively, Davinci Resolve does support Flog2 film simulation LUTS because the color space for FLog2 is Rec 2020 and there is an FLog2 gamut. If all you are doing is changing the path names then you are not getting the correct results.
    • I found the reddit topic i refere to :  https://www.reddit.com/r/davinciresolve/comments/1pc3f1e/cant_apply_new_fujifilm_gfx_55_lut/ "Update for y'all, It's just like what @ExpBalSat said, it's because of the backslashes in the names break them. I changed the file name and it works now. "   For me it was the solution. Realy annoying if it doesn’t work for you 😕  
    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
×
×
  • Create New...