Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've put together some software for myself that allows me to add lens information for pictures taken with adapted/manual lenses on my Fuji X (i.e. anything that is using the "Shoot without lens" option). I find it annoying that all my pictures have a default focal length and nothing else in them.


I have a list of my lenses, with their focal lengths and min/max apertures and just select lens, focal length (for a zoom) and aperture and it gets added to the picture's setting file (my own format) and the information is then added into the EXIF using EXIFTool when uploading to Flickr or outputing a JPEG etc.


So far, so good and this appears to work quite well.


My question is whether I should create an extra entry for each lens if/when using a focal reducer. For example, my Nikon 50/1.8E has a declared focal length of 50. I'm thinking that I could have a second entry called "Nikon 50/1.8E (+ Focal Reducer)" and declare the focal length as 35.


Any thoughts?


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's impressive attention to details of image tech information.

I personally don't care what focus length is stored in my EXIF, and even don't switch that value in camera when changing manual lens.

 

One suggestion for your "+Focal Reducer" option - you can also declare reduced aperture value there. In particular case it's 35mm f1.2.

Basically such lens even exists and is adaptable for Fuji-X, it's Voigtlander 35mm f1.2. And it has the similar size to Nikon 50mm 1.8 + FocalReducer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My question is whether I should create an extra entry for each lens if/when using a focal reducer. For example, my Nikon 50/1.8E has a declared focal length of 50. I'm thinking that I could have a second entry called "Nikon 50/1.8E (+ Focal Reducer)" and declare the focal length as 35.

Any thoughts?

That's what I do. I have a separate entry for when I'm using a focal reducer (with reduced focal length and the reducer info in the Lens Make and Lens Model fields). For example there's a preset called 'Primotar 135/3.5' and another called 'Primotar 135/3.5 (reduced)'. In the second case the 'Lens Model' field reads 'Primotar 135mm f/3.5 (Exakta); Lens Turbo II'.

 

If you're on OSX there's a great little app called 'Exif Editor' by Martin Novák which I use for this purpose. It has a preset editor so you can have a convenient list of all your lenses in a dropdown box. Then it lets you select shots visually and apply all the changes in one go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...