Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I’m a little baffled by fujifilm’s raw/jpeg files.

I bought an older x-e3. Was curious to try. With the tiny 27mm lens. The old model. Bought them both used.

First thing ; I set it up to shoot b&w jpegs ‘Fine’ plus the raw file. When I import into Lightroom the jpeg and raw file are b&w. I’m using Lightroom 10.1.1. I did a test and imported the same files to Capture 1 21 and Capture one did import the raw (raf) files as color. Is there a spot in the Lightroom preferences to ‘choose’ this? I’ve been looking and can’t find anything.

I do have treat jpegs as separate images checked.

Second : I don’t understand the fujifilm raw import. There doesn’t seem to be a naked, neutral fujifilm raw file imported. In Lightroom it always comes in as one of the film simulations. It’s not like a Nikon raw file, or Olympus, where you get their raw file. A base, neutral type file to work from.

Also, Capture 1 shows ‘eterna’ as a choice for a film simulation. That doesn’t appear in Lightroom’s Profile section.

I think I’d prefer to use Lightroom. I know it better than Capture 1. Also, for the initial post process work, I’m not seeing a big difference in Capture 1.

Any help with this appreciated…I’m enjoying the x-e3 body. Shooting with it is fun. Thanks in advance.

Morris

short ps. Truth be told I first bought an x-e1 but the speed of the thing was a bit too slow for me.  Nice camera. I was also curious about the other film simulations. And the newer body does have a wider gamut for making adjustments.

Quote

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fujifilm raw files have a 'small' jpeg preview file stored inside of them along with the raw data. The jpeg is built using the film simulation and camera settings you chose at the time you took the shot. The jpeg preview is used by some third party raw developers to give you an initial image. You can change any of their develop parameters as you wish and the raw data will be (is supposed to be) used to then make the final image.

For example, since you are using both raw and jpg images, you can set the in-camera  film simulation as black and white, import the raw and jpg files, the jpg will be black and white, the raw image will initially be black and white in your raw developer, but you can change the film simulation to one of the color ones and continue on your way to having a black and white and color version of the same image.

There are plenty of third party raw developers, some paid for and some free, each has their merits of course, part of the development fun is finding which one you like for a certain type of image.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 7/27/2021 at 4:59 PM, jerryy said:

Fujifilm raw files have a 'small' jpeg preview file stored inside of them along with the raw data. The jpeg is built using the film simulation and camera settings you chose at the time you took the shot. The jpeg preview is used by some third party raw developers to give you an initial image. You can change any of their develop parameters as you wish and the raw data will be (is supposed to be) used to then make the final image.

For example, since you are using both raw and jpg images, you can set the in-camera  film simulation as black and white, import the raw and jpg files, the jpg will be black and white, the raw image will initially be black and white in your raw developer, but you can change the film simulation to one of the color ones and continue on your way to having a black and white and color version of the same image.

There are plenty of third party raw developers, some paid for and some free, each has their merits of course, part of the development fun is finding which one you like for a certain type of image.

Ok, thanks for all this info Jerryy...it helps me get a handle on fuji raf and jpeg files. Sorry for tardy reply. It has been one of those kind of weeks...

kind regards

m

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • A fungus in the forest.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      (p.s. Open Topic.)  
    • The backslashes you are referring are just symbols denoting path.  Once you import into these LUTS into Davinci Resolve those backslashes are removed by default and you only see is the true file name which has no backslashes.  Convince yourself of this by opening the LUT folder from the Davinci Resolve Project Settings.  Do you see any backslashes in those LUT names? Of course not.  The only name you see is the one that has the underscores and the periods. These LUTS work as designed without having to change any path names.  However, they need to be set up properly through CSTs and by what is supported in Davinci Resolve.  Hence, the FLog2C film simulation LUTS cannot be used because Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut color space and the FLog2C gamut. Alternatively, Davinci Resolve does support Flog2 film simulation LUTS because the color space for FLog2 is Rec 2020 and there is an FLog2 gamut. If all you are doing is changing the path names then you are not getting the correct results.
    • I found the reddit topic i refere to :  https://www.reddit.com/r/davinciresolve/comments/1pc3f1e/cant_apply_new_fujifilm_gfx_55_lut/ "Update for y'all, It's just like what @ExpBalSat said, it's because of the backslashes in the names break them. I changed the file name and it works now. "   For me it was the solution. Realy annoying if it doesn’t work for you 😕  
    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
×
×
  • Create New...