Comparing screens on the X-S10 / X-T4 /X-A7

[natswright]

I have all three of the above cameras, and thought i'd do a side by side comparison.

Spec as follows

X-T4 - 1.6 million pixels
X-S10 - 1 million pixels
X-A7 - 2.7 million pixels

Now, despite its great price, the X-A7 (and X-T200) have a 2.7k screen. It is a nice screen, but when I compared it to the X-S10 and X-T4 it looked lower resolution. I could see the pixels around the display overlay lettering, where as on the other cameras they were smooth. I guess this could just be antialiasing, with the faster hardware, but they just looked sharper, despite fewer pixels.

Has anyone else noticed the 2.7k screen on the X-A7 / X-T200 does not quite look as high res as it should be?

[Joe Roxx]

I've the X-T200 and the X-S10. I actually find the display on the 3.5" display on the X-T200 "better" than the 3" display on the X-S10.

Just for kicks, I used a magnifying glass to compare when I saw your post. It was not a scientific comparison by any stretch, just "eyeballing" it. They appeared pretty comparable with a slight advantage to the X-T200.