Jump to content

Recent trip to Boston and Coastal Maine - X-T10 shot analysis


Recommended Posts

I’ve just returned from a 10-day vacation to Boston and Coastal Maine, including Acadia National Park. I took my X-T10 with the following lenses: XF 10-24, XF 27 and XF 18-135. I had recently purchased the 10-24, so I was excited to shoot with it. Prior to the trip, I had anticipated that I would shoot mostly with the 18-135 because of its large focal length range, however in reality, I use the 10-24 significantly more than the 18-135. FYI, I had also anticipated using the 27 at night just to have a smaller payload to carry.  

 

All total, I took just over 850 shots. Of those, I kept 300 as “mementos” and then narrowed those down further to 89 which I consider “showable” on Flickr. Of the 300 keepers, 228 were shot with the 10-24. This really is a fantastic lens. In all honesty, the only reason I used the 18-135 was to shoot some flowers, butterflies and hummingbirds. Except for those shots, I could have gotten by just fine with only the 10-24.

 

While on the trip, it was funny to see hundreds of folks taking iPhone shots. I also think it’s interesting to note that people carrying DSLRs and the comparably hugeness of those cameras. On one occasion, I asked someone with a Canon EOS to take a shot of my wife and me. As they handed me back my X-T10 with the 10-24 attached, they commented: “Want to trade?”  I responded with, “Sorry, but there’s no way I’d give up my Fuji glass.”

 

Another thing I noticed was that the Canon and Nikon folks tended to have neck straps with large logos that boldly proclaim their brand loyalty – not so with Fuji shooters. We just carry our (noticeably smaller) equipment and walk away with the best shots in the world.

 

Here’s a link to my Flickr album for anyone that’s interested:  https://www.flickr.com/photos/tedgamble/albums/72157658417469231

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

       
    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
×
×
  • Create New...