Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have been thinking of buying one of these lenses but the various sources on line ( with many examples) showing results achieved with these lenses ( many different brands available on line) showed ( although some talked about it in favorable terms) results which were VERY soft at best.

 

Mind you I owned a 35 1.4 until few days ago and I was going to buy one of these simply for fun.

 

Having seen the results of many people talking of these type of lenses on line I really think that this lens, especially used at 1.4 is simply too soft to offer any other practical use that wouldn’t be classed as a special effect or occasional photography

 

On the other hand, some people spend good money buying soft lenses like the lensbaby soft...

Link to post
Share on other sites

From my trials on the CCTV lenses on Nikon, those are just bad. Like really bad... Poor build quality, sharpness is all over the place. The glass can sometimes color tinted for no absolute reasons, the F-ring wouldn't turn or give completely wrong value, so you have to shoot almost always wideopen but that's where it's IQ is the poorest.

 

Sometimes you can get one less mediocre than the others but that's about it.

 

I would still follow Milandro's advice and use a legacy lens with an adapted mount.

 

Now if you want to play with the FoV of a 35mm, grab your zoom kit and zoom it at 35mm, easy enough and does a decent enough job for no extra cost and still have good IQ.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...