Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I’m about to purchase a Fuji X100V and know that some photographers have complained in the past about Lightrooms ability to render crisp fine details eg foliage.

I plan to edit “on the move” and wish to use L/R C/C on my Ipad Pro to fine tune my Fuji Jpegs.

I like L/R as the process from start to finish seems seamless - Great.

The point is this. Will the relatively new “enhance details” feature on lightroom work for Jpegs or is it purely for Raw ?

I like the idea of Jpegs, as Fuji’s are very good however sometimes a tweak is necessary.

Thank you much for reading this.

Adam

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

When you shoot RAW+JPEG it doesn't make sense to edit the JPEG with tools like sharpening, noise reduction and enhance details in LR or C1 or any of those tools. In almost all cases it makes the JPEG quality worse. All these 'raw-processing actions' are done by the camera when processing the RAW file to a JPEG. You can control that process by the camera settings: http://fujifilm-dsc.com/en-int/manual/x100v/menu_shooting/image_quality_setting/index.html or create a custom setting in your camera to handle that.

What you can do with the JPEG in LR or C1 are actions like cropping, culling and tagging. You can also make limited changes to white balance and overall exposure but even these I would preferably do on the RAW file rather than the JPEG. The issue is that the JPEG is a compressed file with severely reduced dynamic range and colors. Changes to these files generally have a much broader impact, than the pinpoint precision that you can apply to a RAW-file.

Consider the RAW file to be the original Word document and the JPEG the PDF-file. It's much easier to invisibly change the text of a document in Word before making a PDF of it, than to try and change the text in the PDF viewer. It's like putting raisins into an already baked cake... 🙂

What you can do is use the Fuji film profiles/simulations that are available in LR or C1 and apply these on the RAW-files. Note that the profiles in C1 are much better and closer to the original Fuji film simulations than those of LR. An alternative is using Fuji X Raw Studio software. It uses the JPEG-engine in your camera to rerun the RAW to JPEG conversion, based on the settings that you apply in the software. So if you have a JPEG but you need slightly more sharpening, connect your camera to the software, find the original RAW-file, change the IQ settings and rerun the JPEG conversion. 

Edited by Herco
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • All three of my bodies (X-E2, X-T4, GFX100S II) have shoot without lenses enabled and they have all had it set since I bought them.  No harm in it at all. Just remember to set the focal length when you fit a manual lens with no electronics otherwise the IBIS (if you have it) goes nuts. I regularly use vintage film lenses from Minolta, Zeiss, Mamiya, Rollei and others on my X mounts along with more modern manual focus stuff from TTArtisans. I also use Nikon AF-S lenses with a Fringer so the world is your oyster! Vintage lenses can be an absolute bargain too - For example the Zeiss 135 f/35 in M42 is as cheap as chips and very sharp as is the excellent Minolta 35-70 Macro (which is also rebadged Leica). 
    • I'm not exaggerating when I say that I have searched with great vigor (and at great expense) for a way to capture IR images with a Fujifilm camera for which I didn't have to use major amounts of sharpening to bring out the best. Zooms, primes, Fuji, Tamron, Viltrox, Sigma, Zeiss ... probably 20 lenses all told. Plus multiple IR converted Fuji cameras, X-T1, X-T3, X-T5. I even tried different ways of filtering IR, such as using the Kolari clip-ins and lens-mounted front filters. I was ready to give up until I almost accidentally tried one of the cheapest lenses out there -- the little TTArtisan 27mm F2.8. No hotspots that I could see, and best of all ABSOLUTELY SUPERB SHARPNESS across the entire frame. It's this attribute that I search for, and until now, never achieved. In my prior attempts, I listened to the advice from the "pundits", picking up a copy of the venerable Fuji 14mm F2.8, the Zeiss Touitt 12mm F2.8, Fuji 23 and 35mm F2.0, even the very similar 7Artisans 27mm F2.8, and none of them come even close to the TTArtisan for edge sharpness in infrared. Incidentally, I'm using a Kolari 720nm clip-in filter. Sure the TT has its issues -- vignetting at 2.8, tendency to flare with sunlight nearby, but all in all, this lens is glued to my X-T5 for now. This image was taken hand-held with this lens -- completely unedited!
    • Hy there When Im using the fan001 on the XH2s and I flip the LCD Screen vertically by 180 degrees then the image flips vertically, what is good but it also flips horizontally. The clean feed on HDMI is not flipping horizontally but its also flipping if the HDMI output info display is on. When I unmount the fan then the image flips only vertically. My firmware is updated to the latest version. Any ideas if there is a fix for that?
    • In reply to the original question, it all depends on what you mean by infrared.  If you mean "see thermal information", then I agree with the comments here.  However, if you mean near-infrared, the X-T4, or basically any digital camera can be modified to "see" it.  Check out Lifepixel.com and Kolarivision.com for more info. As regards lenses, I'm not exaggerating when I say that I have searched with great vigor (and at great expense) for a way to capture IR images with a Fujifilm camera for which I didn't have to use major amounts of sharpening to bring out the best. Zooms, primes, Fuji, Tamron, Viltrox, Sigma, Zeiss ... probably 20 lenses all told. Plus multiple IR converted Fuji cameras, X-T1, X-T3, X-T5. I even tried different ways of filtering IR, such as using the Kolari clip-ins and lens-mounted front filters. I was ready to give up until I almost accidentally tried one of the cheapest lenses out there -- the little TTArtisan 27mm F2.8. No hotspots that I could see, and best of all ABSOLUTELY SUPERB SHARPNESS across the entire frame. It's this attribute that I search for, and until now, never achieved. In my prior attempts, I listened to the advice from the "pundits", picking up a copy of the venerable Fuji 14mm F2.8, the Zeiss Touitt 12mm F2.8, Fuji 23 and 35mm F2.0, even the very similar 7Artisans 27mm F2.8, and none of them come even close to the TTArtisan for edge sharpness in infrared. Incidentally, I'm using a Kolari 720nm clip-in filter. Sure the TT has its issues -- vignetting at 2.8, tendency to flare with sunlight nearby, but all in all, this lens is glued to my X-T5 for now. This image was taken hand-held with this lens -- completely unedited!
    • No - I don’t think so - it means you can take pictures if you remove the lens completely - but I’m not sure that is a problem
×
×
  • Create New...