russw

Why limit to Fuji lenses? I like the Zeiss 12 (wider than Fuji 14 and at least as sharp), Fuji 23, Fuji 56

20fps burst with AF checked 60 times per second without any viewfinder blackout is way better than X-T2
 
It has way more phase detect AF points, spread over much more of the image.
 
It has way better battery life despite having way more horsepower under the hood
 
The electronic shutter has no rolling shutter issues
 
It has in-camera 5-axis IS
 
It's full frame
 
Just because another camera comes out that's better than yours doesn't mean your camera gets worse. You can be excited for Sony and for people who will buy, use, and love the camera, all without having to hate your gear, or feel bad about yourself. The a9 is objectively better than the X-T2 in basically every objective way, and yet the X-T2 will probably do just fine taking nearly any photo you could want to take. It's okay. Take deep breaths. 

09:56 by Peter Zimmer, auf Flickr

walk on by by Peter Zimmer, auf Flickr

the observer by Peter Zimmer, auf Flickr

in between. by P. Zimmer, auf Flickr

in lockstep. by P. Zimmer, auf Flickr

Maarja Pild @Tallinn, Estonia by Hendrik Osula, on Flickr

Abel, for Flag Models.
 
Fujifilm X-T1, XF35/2 and one Cactus RF60.

Hanna and Tõnis @Pelguranna, Tallinn, Estonia by Hendrik Osula, on Flickr
 
Hanna and Tõnis @Pelguranna, Tallinn, Estonia by Hendrik Osula, on Flickr
 
Both taken with X100s

X-T10, 35/1.4
 

 

Abel, for Flag Models.
 
Fuji X-T1 and XF 35 f2. One speedlight, a MagMod grid and a quarter CTO gel.

light source one - a daylight.  Illumination by a reflector

Fujifilm X-T1 + 23 + 56
 
SOKL5304 by Kirill Sokolov, on Flickr
 
SOKL5309 by Kirill Sokolov, on Flickr
 
SOKL5329 by Kirill Sokolov, on Flickr
 
SOKL5354 by Kirill Sokolov, on Flickr
 
SOKL5365 by Kirill Sokolov, on Flickr
 
SOKL5371 by Kirill Sokolov, on Flickr
 
SOKL5326 by Kirill Sokolov, on Flickr

xpro2 56mm 1.2 silver floppy
khaboshi by Roger Jones, on Flickr
khaboshi by Roger Jones, on Flickr

Fujifilm X-T1 + 56 + 23
 
0008 by Kirill Sokolov, on Flickr
 
0010 by Kirill Sokolov, on Flickr
 
0012 by Kirill Sokolov, on Flickr
 
0014 by Kirill Sokolov, on Flickr
 
0016 by Kirill Sokolov, on Flickr
 
0017 by Kirill Sokolov, on Flickr
 
0018 by Kirill Sokolov, on Flickr
 
0020 by Kirill Sokolov, on Flickr
 
0021 by Kirill Sokolov, on Flickr

Not really, but I did miss focus ever so slightly on two of them. F1.2 or thereabouts will do that for you, shooting handheld and natural light only at minimum focus distance on an overcast day in a dark room. Also, jpeg compression doesn't help. Full res versions are mostly crazy sharp. I tend not to sharpen that much, most pics nowadays are way oversharpened, and then people complain and say they look "digital"
 
I don't care if one or two are not as sharp, as long as it's acceptable. I shoot film half the time, so I can live without crazy sharpness anyway.
 
And thanks :)

M o d e l : N a m w h a n   #XE1 #XF90mmF2  

Untitled by Andrew Lee, on Flickr

Lieze

X-T1, 56 1.2 APD

Wind & Glamour by Dalibor Tomic, on Flickr

Lieze
 
X-T1, 56 1.2 APD

Foam portrait (X100S)
 

Foam portrait by Pascal van Gerven, on Flickr

Vintage Light by Dalibor Tomic, on Flickr
 
XT-1 + 90F2

Alex
Fujifilm X-T1 + 56 + 23
 
SOKL4246 by Kirill Sokolov, on Flickr
 
SOKL4253 by Kirill Sokolov, on Flickr
 
SOKL4270 by Kirill Sokolov, on Flickr
 
SOKL4286 by Kirill Sokolov, on Flickr