So, I used to have an X-t2, 10-24, 23 and 35 1.4 and 56 1.2.
Then I had an unsavoury rush of blood to the head and traded it all in to enter another marque. Some 9 months later and it is not working out for me so I’ve just agreed a deal to sell the other kit, which will allow me to start again from scratch with a reasonable sum of money in hand. I need a system for my landscapes, cityscapes, dog photography and pictures of the wife and kids when they occasionally agree.
I think I’m decided on the x-t4, given that I did really like my x-t2. I think my only complaints was in the focusing department.
For my landscape stuff, I loved the old 10-24 I had before so it would be easy to just get the new WR version. But watching a few reviews it seems that the much larger, heavier, more expensive, unable to use filters, 8-16 is significantly sharper, which I like. The 14 and 16 are not wide or flexible enough. The WA zoom will get the most use.
The next most use will likely come from the mid-focal length. Both the 23 and 35 f1.4 I had before were good. I liked the 56 1.2 when it achieved focus so could go for that or the APD version? How about the 16-55 f2.8 though.
For the longer ranger stuff I could go 50-2140 2.8, the cheaper, slower 55-200, or the seemingly excellent 90 f2.
Sooo many choices and once again, I’ve told myself I want to stick with a max of three lenses if possible.
Any thoughts?
Best, David