Jump to content

XT20 pre-af in auto mode

parastratos

By parastratos
in Fuji X-T2 / Fuji X-T20

 Share

Recommended Posts

parastratos Newbie

parastratos

Posted
Posted

I just mounted a fujinon 27mm lens to my xt20 and I noticed that it makes a constant sound because it keeps trying to auto focus.

My 16-50 lens didn't have the same behavior.

I have disabled the pre-af option in non-auto mode but I don't have access to this option in auto mode.

I upgraded the body's firmware but didn't see any difference...

So I have some questions:

Is this normal for a lens to have this behavior?

Can I somehow disable the pre-af on auto mode?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Doug Pardee Enthusiast

Doug Pardee

Posted
Posted (edited)

Select any Auto scene mode other than SR+ -- use Portrait, Portrait Enhancer, Landscape, Sport, etc.

SR+ (automated scene recognition) needs to continuously scan to determine what kind of scene the camera is pointed at now. That includes varying the focus. If you leave the camera pointed at a scene for a few seconds, SR+ should settle down. As soon as you point somewhere else, or something in the scene changes, it'll start back up again.

If you select a specific scene mode, there's no need for all of that scanning.

SR+ is a battery hog, and if you're going to use Auto, I definitely recommend selecting an appropriate scene mode whenever you can.

Oh, and the lens difference is just that the 27mm focuses by moving the entire optical assembly back and forth, which is slow and noisy... but retains excellent IQ given the restrictions of the pancake form factor. You'll see similar behavior on the Fuji primes that are faster than f/2. The 16-50 was doing the same thing, but with its lightweight inner-focusing system it's only obvious if you're looking through the viewfinder.

Edited by Doug Pardee
Added discussion of lens difference
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • thelostkiwi
      Looking for Full Frame lenses to adapt to GFX

      By thelostkiwi · Posted

      I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Trevor R
      Image correction with GF20-35

      By Trevor R · Posted

      Thank you. I will research it.
    • jerryy
      Image correction with GF20-35

      By jerryy · Posted

      Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Trevor R
      Image correction with GF20-35

      By Trevor R · Posted

      Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • jerryy
      Image correction with GF20-35

      By jerryy · Posted

      Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...