Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Started thinking about a split lens (not sure of the technical term) for taking 3D video and fair 3D stills and wondered if anyone else might be interested.

There are some 2-path + combiner lens designs out there as examples you can find on a search for 3D lenses. Ideally, the lens would have twin shutters synchronized to the camera for field-sequential 3D. If the sensor can capture continuous 60 fps stereo (120 fps) and switch to the maximum capture rate for a burst to obtain a pair of stills with minimal temporal separation, a single-sensor body may be good enough. The lens, of course, would be optically slow and heavy along with being expensive but I might be interested in purchasing it. The current generation sensor and processor should work and the next generation will be even more capable as physical and electronic shutters become faster in order to minimize ghosting.

 

Varying pupil distance, or whatever the photography term is for it, for hyper/hypo-stereo, or a zoom, may be too much to ask of a lens this unique for Fuji X systems right now so I would settle for as fast a prime as possible in a package not too horribly bulky. It may be difficult enough to calibrate focus for the two optical paths before they are combined in front of the sensor. IQ will be challenging.

 

Anyway, are there any thoughts on this?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a problem turning a normal camera into a stereo capable camera, but not a kludge.  There are a variety of devices such as the one illustrated here. They work, but with limitations. Since they place the images on a single frame, they demand vertical imaging. This one was made by Pentax, and is of very high quality, with front surface mirrors and rigid geometry. It only works well on a normal lens—around 50mm with film, and with the 35mm Fujinon. Since both images are in the same frame, it effectively sets the field of view at double the lens's focal length. No way around it.

(Pardon the image quality. Late at night. Shot in the kitchen with the kitchen light, not in a commercial studio.)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

A far better solution is tracking down a used Fujifilm Finepix W1 or W3. These are neat, pocket-size cameras designed to be fully featured stereo cameras. They work very well and have a fanatic following. Why reinvent the wheel when Fuji has already given us the solution?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • A fungus in the forest.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      (p.s. Open Topic.)  
    • The backslashes you are referring are just symbols denoting path.  Once you import into these LUTS into Davinci Resolve those backslashes are removed by default and you only see is the true file name which has no backslashes.  Convince yourself of this by opening the LUT folder from the Davinci Resolve Project Settings.  Do you see any backslashes in those LUT names? Of course not.  The only name you see is the one that has the underscores and the periods. These LUTS work as designed without having to change any path names.  However, they need to be set up properly through CSTs and by what is supported in Davinci Resolve.  Hence, the FLog2C film simulation LUTS cannot be used because Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut color space and the FLog2C gamut. Alternatively, Davinci Resolve does support Flog2 film simulation LUTS because the color space for FLog2 is Rec 2020 and there is an FLog2 gamut. If all you are doing is changing the path names then you are not getting the correct results.
    • I found the reddit topic i refere to :  https://www.reddit.com/r/davinciresolve/comments/1pc3f1e/cant_apply_new_fujifilm_gfx_55_lut/ "Update for y'all, It's just like what @ExpBalSat said, it's because of the backslashes in the names break them. I changed the file name and it works now. "   For me it was the solution. Realy annoying if it doesn’t work for you 😕  
    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
×
×
  • Create New...