Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So, I was shocked to see an ad for a used XT-2 + 56mm f1.2 + 16mm f1.4 all in excellent condition for 2000$.

 

I know it seems that it's too good to be true BUT in Kuwait Fujifilm is so unpopular that a lot of people don't even know WHAT IS FUJIFILM.

 

I've contacted the guy, he sent me photos and receipts and he knows there's no aftermarket for fujifilm cameras in Kuwait and he is looking to switch to Canon.

 

The problem is that I owm both of these lenses but looking for a backup body. Was thinking of the new XE-3 but I would love to know what everyone thinks of the xt-2 instead of the xe-3 as a backup.

 

He would sell the body alone for 1000$ (warranty expired). And he doesn't know the shutter count but says that it is rarely used.

Do you know anyway to check the shutter count?

 

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fuji has no shutter counter accessible to the public ( if there is one it maybe only accessible to the service department) the counter can be reset so there is no way to know how many shots it has taken, but since the camera is relatively new it is unlikely that it was used above and beyond what the shutter can take.

 

I think the price is actually very good. Of course the XE3 is in the same range, but it is a different camera. Your choice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...