Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I would like to digitize old Super8 Films by automated photographing of single film frames. Which lens would you recommend to capture a 12x8mm area, e.g. a magnigifaction of about two.

 

Super8 film can reach very high densities. Hence, it is important to have a lens with low flare to be able to capture details in the dark areas.

 

Thank you in advance for sharing your ideas,

 

Jan

Link to post
Share on other sites

For this specific task I'd think about the Canon MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1-5x Macro. But you should know that it has an electronic aperture control only, despite being full manual for everything else. So you would need a Canon body to close the aperture once to the desired value.

I'll try to think about something else...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for your feedback. Theoretically the Mitakon in 4x mode should exactly cover the 6 mm width of a Super8 frame.

 

I will try the Mitakon with my X-T2 and compare it to a traditional 1:1 reproduction setup, e.g. mounting an 'Apo Rodagon D 75 f4' on a 'Canon 5D MkII' that I can both borrow.

 

Best,

 

Jan

Link to post
Share on other sites

my comment was directed to the poster before of me ^ who suggested an 2:1 macro lens.

 

 

A  2:1 is not going to be able to fit a super 8 frame in an aps-c, you need , at least, a 4X magnification

Edited by milandro
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...