Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Currently, Capture One just released an update to support X-T2 compressed RAWs. Fuji also released its X Acquire software a few months ago.

 

So I set X Acquire's destination folder to a Capture One Hot folder, and it works well. It is speedy and seems reliable. I tested against Lightroom, and it's significantly faster. I'm going to try this out on my next real shoot that requires tethering. 

Edited by Jwctp
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Do you know if something has been improved in the the raw processing or just to support compressed files?

 

Do you like the output?

I saw some comparisons between different products, Capture One being one of them and I was not impressed by how it processed the raw data from X-Trans. I actually liked Lightroom output more.

I may have to download C1 and give it a try.

 

Thanks for the update :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

They support the compressed RAWs. Capture One also said they redesigned the X-Trans RAW processing. So maybe there is an upgrade. Also note that I shoot portraits and fashion without much sharpening, which Capture One excels at. I don't shoot landscapes to see the typical X-Trans issues like watercolor, worms, etc. 

 

 

Hi,

Do you know if something has been improved in the the raw processing or just to support compressed files?

Do you like the output?
I saw some comparisons between different products, Capture One being one of them and I was not impressed by how it processed the raw data from X-Trans. I actually liked Lightroom output more.
I may have to download C1 and give it a try.

Thanks for the update :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

etomcat:

 

The C1Pro is very comprehensive SW and is oriented for professional use. Not so easy to learn as LR. Only basic editing need min. one month studies. But the results - when you really learn customizing and processing in C1Pro - are on very high level, especially the RAF files.

I´m C1Pro user since version 4 and I was simultaneously user LR 4, 5, 6 for other systems as Fuji. From my experience is C1Pro the best RAF editor in Windows. Specially for skin tones, excellent detail resolution and w/o watercolor effect.... and the editing/masking in up to 16 layers pro image is awesome.

Edited by hildasea
Link to post
Share on other sites

They support the compressed RAWs. Capture One also said they redesigned the X-Trans RAW processing. So maybe there is an upgrade. Also note that I shoot portraits and fashion without much sharpening, which Capture One excels at. I don't shoot landscapes to see the typical X-Trans issues like watercolor, worms, etc.

Thank you

Edited by etomcat
Link to post
Share on other sites

etomcat:

 

The C1Pro is very comprehensive SW and is oriented for professional use. Not so easy to learn as LR. Only basic editing need min. one month studies. But the results - when you really learn customizing and processing in C1Pro - are on very high level, especially the RAF files.

I´m C1Pro user since version 4 and I was simultaneously user LR 4, 5, 6 for other systems as Fuji. From my experience is C1Pro the best RAF editor in Windows. Specially for skin tones, excellent detail resolution and w/o watercolor effect.... and the editing/masking in up to 16 layers pro image is awesome.

hildasea,

 

Thank you for all the details. I just downloaded the trial and will give it a try. I currently use Luminar which supports Fuji RAW, but I do not like how it process them. The sharpening and the noise reduction algorithms work fine on Nikon RAW, but on Fuji produce this watercolour effect. Guess it is not really optimized for that sensor. Otherwise I like its interface approach.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...