Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is anyone else having trouble getting sharp images with exposures longer than 2-3 seconds.   I think I am ticking  all the boxes I use a very  stable Manfrotto tripod with a locked down head,  A nice tight manfrotto L-bracket  tripod mount.  IS is turned off and I am using a timer or the app for actuation.  it seems if a seagull walks past the shot develops movement.  I Really want to use longer exposure times 30 sec to several minutes but I cant get them sharp they are unusable.  I  dont particularly want to take a time exposure and then try to get a faster shutter speed to add the sharpness back onto the landscape or urban landscape.  All ideas are welcomed.  thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the forum.

Can you post an image to demonstrate what you are getting?

Unfortunately there are a lot of components where a problem in any one of them will ruin an image. You may have already tried this, but here are some things:

Tripod and mount (mount, in this case, probably will be the ball head). Putting rubber feet on the tripod can help for some surfaces as can installing the spikes that often come with tripod kits and make sure the legs are firmly smooshed into the ground. Not all tripods do well at suppressing vibrations for long exposure photography, they are fine for fast shutter speeds. Any looseness in the locks will let the camera shake.

Whatever the ball head’s weight limit is, try not to load it beyond one-half of that rating. For example, if the ball head (and tripod) are rated to hold 20 lbs. —- about 9 kilograms —- only put up to about half that weight, 10 lbs. —- about 4,5 kilograms.

Definitely turn off all image stabilization tech, as well as any pixel shifting tech.

How much surface area is sticking up into the air matters. If the camera is up where any breeze, no matter how slight, can catch it, the camera can sway. The sturdier the tripod with the camera mounted as low to the ground as you can get, the better the images will turn out. If you have a neck-strap or similar on the camera, watch it as session goes on. If the strap is moving, the camera can be swaying.

I am guessing you are using camera lenses. There is something called focus creep and something called zoom creep. Unless you have the lens perfectly horizontal, and even if you do have it that way, as the temperature changes, the focus will change and you will have to reset it.

Are you using the electronic shutter? Sometimes using the mechanical shutter can cause a slight vibration the tripod will not absorb so the vibration goes back into the image. This is more noticeable for highly magnified subjects and usually for not landscape work, but it is there.

Are you using the built in interval timer?

One thing to note with landscape work, bushes and trees move and  once you get past ten seconds or so, your image will really show that smearing motion blur.

I hope this helps.

 

Edited by jerryy
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Secondo me dipende dal modello di obiettivo.

Anche io uso un Manfrotto 055 per foto notturne o con filtri: con il 45-100 ho avuto risultati scadenti, perchè molto sbilanciato in avanti e quindi sensibile ad ogni minimo disturbo.

Nessun problema con 20-35 (non sbilanciato) e con il leggero 35-70kit.

Un suggerimento: per migliorare la stabilità esistono accessori da avvitare alla base della fotocamera con una staffa rivolta in avanti che sorregge meglio l'obiettivo.

In ogni caso, il micromosso è sempre in agguato...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it also depends on the lens model. I also use a Manfrotto 055 for night photography or with filters: I've had poor results with the 45-100 because it's very biased toward the front and therefore sensitive to even the slightest disturbance. No problems with the 20-35 (not biased) or the lightweight 35-70 kit. A tip: to improve stability, there are accessories that screw onto the base of the camera with a forward-facing bracket that better supports the lens. In any case, camera shake is always a possibility...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Well done! p.s. Welcome to the forum.
    • I think reassigning the exposure compensation dial a good start.  The 520 page online manual should be condensed along with the number of setting options. Maybe they could have multiple firmware options for the X-E5; a pro-version, a photo enthusiasts version and a point and shoot version.  I love my X-E5 photographs but as a typical senior, with declining cognitive skills, I’m sorry say that I find the current singular version unnecessarily challenging. 
    • I was told the GFX 100 II couldn't do this so I decided to test it:    

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • You appear certain you intend to use this lens for astrophotography. Hmmm. Are you willing to consider the suggestion you will be better off trying the XF-500mm prime lens instead? Simply put, prime lenses are way better than zoom lenses for astrophotography while the XF 150-600mm is great for terra photography. 1.) The lens hood’s connection placement on zoom lenses is right on the very edge of the lens body. This is a loose connection that allows any tiny stray light to enter the lens and then bounce around the many lens element groups, ending up on the sensor, causing all kinds of gradient troubles. For terra photography, cough, cough -daytime photography- cough, cough, this is not a problem because that little stray light is lost among the bright daytime backgrounds. Prime lens hood’s loose connection placement tends to be further up on the lens body, so stray light is usually not able to bounce into the lens so easily. 2.) Weather changes affects the lenses. All lenses can have focus creep even when pointed horizontally, cold and hot causes the mechanical parts to expand or contract differently, but especially when pointed up in the sky because gravity also pulls on the parts. Zoom lenses additionally have something called ‘zoom creep’ which you can figure into the issues you will face during your sessions. Essentially, you need to refocus when it gets cooler during the night. If you are determined to try this lens anyway, best wishes!!! It is possible to make a homemade lens hood. There are plenty of companies that sell dew heater straps fitting this lens to keep it from frosting over during your sessions. Also, you can find Bahtinov Masks or Carey Masks that will fit the lens. These make focusing on the stars much, much easier and are not difficult to learn how to. Or, if your camera body is one of the top line bodies that Fujifilm has released the SDK for, various astrophotography apps will take the live view and help you focus. Say X-T3 but not X-T30, etc. p.s. Welcome to the forum.
    • I had no problem finding a spot at the beach this afternoon.  Was not crowded at all. GFX100 RF.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

×
×
  • Create New...