Jump to content

Recommended Posts

THIS IS A COPY OF AN EMAIL I HAVE SENT TO FUJI.  IF ANY OF YOU HAVE ANY IDEAS, I'D LOVE TO HEAR THEM!

 

I purchased a new XT10 (s/n 67L03084) along with 2 kit lenses in November of this year.  The 16-50 lens s/n is 62H09098.  The s/n of the 50-230 lens is 62H00965.

 

I have also booked a holiday to the Arctic Circle with the sole intention of shooting the Northern Lights.

 

Last night was clear so I took the camera out to try some star pics to see how it performed.  I know that autofocus is unlikely to work under such conditions, so I set the camera to manual focus and set it at the extreme end of its scale, i.e. infinity. The resultant pictures were all blurred.  I then experimented and found that infinity is in focus when the camera suggests there’s still some way to go.  I have repeated this experiment during daylight and it seems the 16-50 kit lens doesn’t focus on infinity when it’s set to infinity.

 

When I am photographing the Northern Lights, the temperature will be in the region of minus 20 degrees and it is extremely unlikely that I will be able to set the focus in such conditions using trial and error (actually, having spent a fair amount of money on said camera, why should I have to use trial and error?).  Furthermore, if it’s just stars, there will be insufficient light for me to manually focus anyway, so I could be out in the freezing cold  taking blurred pictures and I’ll only find that out when I upload them to a computer once inside the hotel.

 

So, my questions are:

1.      Am I doing something wrong?

2.      If not, what is the next step? I need the camera to take pictures of the Northern Lights and it looks like it may not be up to the job.

 

Attached are four files; 2 taken with the focus set on infinity (both blurred) and the other 2 with me manually focussing and ignoring infinity.

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Infinity is very rarely, if at all, ever at the end of a lens' rotation (any lens, any manufacturer, ever) This is due to temperature. If it were at the end for a warm temperature it wouldn't be at the end for a cold one. "Things" expand and contract due to temperature; it's the way of the world. Infinity will be towards the end, turn to the end and bring it back slightly. Many lenses don't even have a hard stop and continue to rotate.

 

There are many posts/helps on the internet showing how to focus at infinity. A simple technique is to focus on a distant object, it's effectively at infinity.

 

Thank yourself lucky you're not using film; then it's a real bummer.

 

I'd advise against SHOUTING in a post; you'll upset some. I DON'T MIND. Also against quoting your serial numbers.

Edited by MirrorMirror
Link to post
Share on other sites

Infinity is very rarely, if at all, ever at the end of a lens' rotation (any lens, any manufacturer, ever) This is due to temperature. If it were at the end for a warm temperature it wouldn't be at the end for a cold one. "Things" expand and contract due to temperature; it's the way of the world. Infinity will be towards the end, turn to the end and bring it back slightly. Many lenses don't even have a hard stop and continue to rotate.

 

There are many posts/helps on the internet showing how to focus at infinity. A simple technique is to focus on a distant object, it's effectively at infinity.

 

Thank yourself lucky you're not using film; then it's a real bummer.

 

I'd advise against SHOUTING in a post; you'll upset some. I DON'T MIND. Also against quoting your serial numbers.

Many thanks for your reply, both speedy and informative - I'll now go and research some web articles.  

Not sure what you mean about "shouting" - maybe it was my use of uppercase at the start of the post?  If so, this was merely to separate and distinguish between the introduction to my query and the body of text that was sent to Fuji.

I feel OK about quoting my serial numbers - essentially everything was a copy&paste from an email.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad to have helped. Yes, capitals signify SHOUTING in writing. It doesn't bother me but some see it as rude, or RUDE!

 

I prefer not to put anything personal on the internet, you never know how it can be used. I've already registered your lenses with Fuji and requested a refund!! :)

 

A colon and right bracket denotes a smiley face, or jest, and will appear here as a yellow face with smile.

Edited by MirrorMirror
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Many thanks for your reply, both speedy and informative - I'll now go and research some web articles.  

Not sure what you mean about "shouting" - maybe it was my use of uppercase at the start of the post?  If so, this was merely to separate and distinguish between the introduction to my query and the body of text that was sent to Fuji.

I feel OK about quoting my serial numbers - essentially everything was a copy&paste from an email.

 

Hi,

 

Did you figure it out after all? I was wondering about infinity focus when capturing stars. I seem to have a hard time manually focusing on the stars afar, even in manual (with 10x digital zoom). I have my assist set to peak in red, but I`m never sur if I need to highlight the outter edge or smack in the middle.

 

Cheers!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I'm not exaggerating when I say that I have searched with great vigor (and at great expense) for a way to capture IR images with a Fujifilm camera for which I didn't have to use major amounts of sharpening to bring out the best. Zooms, primes, Fuji, Tamron, Viltrox, Sigma, Zeiss ... probably 20 lenses all told. Plus multiple IR converted Fuji cameras, X-T1, X-T3, X-T5. I even tried different ways of filtering IR, such as using the Kolari clip-ins and lens-mounted front filters. I was ready to give up until I almost accidentally tried one of the cheapest lenses out there -- the little TTArtisan 27mm F2.8. No hotspots that I could see, and best of all ABSOLUTELY SUPERB SHARPNESS across the entire frame. It's this attribute that I search for, and until now, never achieved. In my prior attempts, I listened to the advice from the "pundits", picking up a copy of the venerable Fuji 14mm F2.8, the Zeiss Touitt 12mm F2.8, Fuji 23 and 35mm F2.0, even the very similar 7Artisans 27mm F2.8, and none of them come even close to the TTArtisan for edge sharpness in infrared. Incidentally, I'm using a Kolari 720nm clip-in filter. Sure the TT has its issues -- vignetting at 2.8, tendency to flare with sunlight nearby, but all in all, this lens is glued to my X-T5 for now. This image was taken hand-held with this lens -- completely unedited!
    • Hy there When Im using the fan001 on the XH2s and I flip the LCD Screen vertically by 180 degrees then the image flips vertically, what is good but it also flips horizontally. The clean feed on HDMI is not flipping horizontally but its also flipping if the HDMI output info display is on. When I unmount the fan then the image flips only vertically. My firmware is updated to the latest version. Any ideas if there is a fix for that?
    • In reply to the original question, it all depends on what you mean by infrared.  If you mean "see thermal information", then I agree with the comments here.  However, if you mean near-infrared, the X-T4, or basically any digital camera can be modified to "see" it.  Check out Lifepixel.com and Kolarivision.com for more info. As regards lenses, I'm not exaggerating when I say that I have searched with great vigor (and at great expense) for a way to capture IR images with a Fujifilm camera for which I didn't have to use major amounts of sharpening to bring out the best. Zooms, primes, Fuji, Tamron, Viltrox, Sigma, Zeiss ... probably 20 lenses all told. Plus multiple IR converted Fuji cameras, X-T1, X-T3, X-T5. I even tried different ways of filtering IR, such as using the Kolari clip-ins and lens-mounted front filters. I was ready to give up until I almost accidentally tried one of the cheapest lenses out there -- the little TTArtisan 27mm F2.8. No hotspots that I could see, and best of all ABSOLUTELY SUPERB SHARPNESS across the entire frame. It's this attribute that I search for, and until now, never achieved. In my prior attempts, I listened to the advice from the "pundits", picking up a copy of the venerable Fuji 14mm F2.8, the Zeiss Touitt 12mm F2.8, Fuji 23 and 35mm F2.0, even the very similar 7Artisans 27mm F2.8, and none of them come even close to the TTArtisan for edge sharpness in infrared. Incidentally, I'm using a Kolari 720nm clip-in filter. Sure the TT has its issues -- vignetting at 2.8, tendency to flare with sunlight nearby, but all in all, this lens is glued to my X-T5 for now. This image was taken hand-held with this lens -- completely unedited!
    • No - I don’t think so - it means you can take pictures if you remove the lens completely - but I’m not sure that is a problem
    • I bought a manual lens over xmas and it took me a while to find the "shutter w/o lens" function in the menu settings.  So far I haven't found a way to either put that on the Q menu or marry that setting to one of the 4 custom modes.   Am I missing something? Is there a problem if I just leave that setting enabled even when the OEM auto lens is in place? tia
×
×
  • Create New...