Jump to content

Shutterbug - 5 Reasons Mirrorless Telephoto Lenses are Great for Photographing Nature and Wildlife


Recommended Posts

Mirrorless-Telephoto-vs-DSLR_0.jpg?itok=

Link to Article: http://www.shutterbug.com/content/5-reasons-mirrorless-telephoto-lenses-are-great-photographing-wildlife-nature

 

 

Fuji with 2 lenses on the list, the 50-140 (naturally) they gave the 55-200 props as well.

 

FW 4.0 can't get here soon enough.  How much will those changes in AF help with wildlife photography in your opinion?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have taken my 55-200 on a recent trip to the US and Canada with some success. It allowed me to travel by air without having to worry about excess weight and I haven't missed a single shot because of the smaller camera system. For slow moving subjects, this lens paired with and X-T1 worked fine. For birds in flight it would be challenged since the focusing is not the fastest. No doubt, the upcoming FW update for the X-T1 and the planned 100-400 lens should be up to that task quite nicely. 

 

I should mention that the camera and lens performed in -30DegC without a hitch. This same setup will be my backup for a trip to photograph bears in Alaska in next month. I am sure it will perform just as well.

 

I have used this combination for some local Bird-In-Flight work with occasional success. To be honest, it worked better that I expected, but until the really long lens comes along, I am stuck to the D800E and the 500mm prime. The reduction in weight will be very welcome when the new lens finally finds its way into my bag.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

       
    • More testing of lenses today.  Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 IF ED VR (same applies to VR II) - dreadful. Heavy vignette at all focal lengths and apertures. Obvioulsy fine in 35mm mode.  Nikon 70-200 f/4 - some vignetting at full frame (similar to 24mm f/1.8 and Sigma 105 f/2.8 so probably correctable or slight crop to 80-90MP). Perfect in 35mm mode.  If weight is an issue for you the kit 35-70 Fuji GFX lens is lightweight and better than you might expect but isn't a fast lens at f/4.5-5.6 
    • Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

       
    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
×
×
  • Create New...