Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hey guys!

 

I'm a Canon shooter looking to save my back and wallet, and I wanted to switch over.  I have a few questions. 

 

This is my current kit:

Canon 6D

50mm 1.2L

85mm 1.2L

16-35mm 2.8L

70-200mm 2.8L

 

The 6D + 16-35mm 2.8 combination is allowing me to capture low light images in tight spaces very quickly.  I particularly need fast, low-light sensitive AF.

 

I also do model photography, and I know the prime lenses have me covered (35mm and 56mm are all I need, I came from 50mm 1.2L and 85mm 1.2L).  

 

My questions are:  

 - Do you guys know if there's FAST 16-35mm-equiv on the horizon?  

 - Would it be best to go with an X-pro2 or the upcoming xt-2?  I don't plan to switch immediately, so I can wait.    

 - Between the X-pro2 and XT-2, which will basically help me break even in costs when switching over

 

 

 

Thanks guys!  And I'm happy to say I'm already using a Fuji product and I love it!  x100t is my gateway to this fascinating Fuji universe!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The one thing you've not mentioned is flash, which I thought would be a crucial part of an event photographers kit. Fuji's options are sorely lacking to that of Canon etc.

 

Personally, unless the OVF is a deal breaker, I'd be waiting for the XT2. Battery grip, likely incremental spec bump for stills and rumoured intro of 4K video would be enough to pause and wait.

 

As for a fast UWA zoom, I believe rumours of an 8-16mm f2.8 exist, or there is always the 26mm f1.4, given you're clearly comfortable with primes.

 

NB the 4K comment above is probably not a deal breaker etc or something you'll need right now but if I were a small business owner (ie pro tog) I'd want to have the ability to launch new product offerings with no/minimal addition capex!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The one thing you've not mentioned is flash, which I thought would be a crucial part of an event photographers kit. Fuji's options are sorely lacking to that of Canon etc.

 

Personally, unless the OVF is a deal breaker, I'd be waiting for the XT2. Battery grip, likely incremental spec bump for stills and rumoured intro of 4K video would be enough to pause and wait.

 

As for a fast UWA zoom, I believe rumours of an 8-16mm f2.8 exist, or there is always the 26mm f1.4, given you're clearly comfortable with primes.

 

NB the 4K comment above is probably not a deal breaker etc or something you'll need right now but if I were a small business owner (ie pro tog) I'd want to have the ability to launch new product offerings with no/minimal addition capex!

 

Flash, i'm okay with.  I shoot flash in manual mode anyway, so I'll be reusing them.  

 

The more I use my X100t for the EVF, the more I realize I don't use the OVF all that much.  Although, I do like the advantage of preparing for shots into the frame.

 

The 8-16mm 2.8 is a very wide lens.  I'd have to do a lot of cropping then.  I really wish there was a fully functional EOS to XF adapter so I could transition my 16-35mm over for a brief while.

 

I recently found out my friend was testing the XT2, and he did say he'd go with that over the xpro2.  Unfortunately, I can't give away much as to what he thinks about the camera.  But, he did recommend going with it.  Since it's also going to have UHS-II, i should have no problem holding down the shutter.

 

Until that ultra-wide is rumored, and the XT2 is out, I suppose I'll have a longer wait!  Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...