Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've been shooting since 2001
Currently I own following autofocus cameras: an original X100, the X100V,  XT1, The original Leica Q, and Sony A7III

The X100V is by a landslide the most unpredictable and unreliably out of the bunch when it comes to autofocus. 
It get's easily confused when subjects are between 5-20 meters away. 
The autofocus miss and end up on a distance between 2-3 meters, when the real object is actually more then 7 meters away. This again resulting in a slightly soft subject, while the foreground is nice and sharp.  

I shoot most street, so i don't need monster fast AF. As a matter of fact, the original x100 has ben perfectly fine, and I never ended up with an image out of focus with that. 
Same goes for both the XT1 or the XT2. 


This is how i use the camera, and it's pretty basic. 
I use singel autofocus point.  The next smallest box.
I use an F-stop at around F4 to F8 99% of the time, where F5,6 is my sweat spot. I shoot mostly in good sunny conditions where the ISO never goes above the 400 mark. 
I normally focus at an object at the distance my subject will be, and wait until subject walk into the frame then shoot the image.  Or i do a focus  recompose. 
This works 100% of the time whit all other cameras then the x100v. 

I notice the same behaviour on an X-T3, but thought the camera was faulty and end up trading it in.

And you should be able to easily recreate it. 

1. Activate the focus distance scale on your X100V/xT3/XT4
2. Set F stop to  F 5.6 or higher (make sure its good light outside) 
2. Make sure u got a target at say 5 meters and one at 10+ meters (both with excellent contrast )
3. Now,  focus between them and shoot image after focus is acquired. Watch where the focus point lands on the distance scale from time to time. 
you will se it jumps around and now and then completely misses, like set the focus at 3 meters and you  subject is more then 20 meters away.  
Watch the image and see how many it will fall short on. 

So is there  any one out there that recognize this and have a fix for it? 
 

Edited by Tor_B
Link to post
Share on other sites

I seriously doubt that what I am going to say will solve your problem (sorry), but its related so I thought I'd throw this in.

Overall I love the X100v (and also have a Sony (a/7/r/4).  I also usually use single shot autofocus also smallest or, more often, next smallest box.  My frustration with the focus is keeping the point of focus in the middle of the frame.  I want to start each shot with the focus point being directly in the middle and then moving it when/if I deem necessary.  Whether I use the touch screen to center it, or if I use the button (lever? I don't know what to call it) - give it a double click to center it - it moves but... it doesnt stay there. Its. just too easy to touch either the lever or the screen as one is shooting and then the next shot(s) are crap. 

There is no way I've found to actually lock it in a way that stays locked in the center (on the other hand, my Sony does this very well). Its too easy to touch the screen or the lever accidentally.  So, if I'm shooting quickly sometimes i miss the fact that it moved and the shot is out of focus because its focussing on one corner or another.  

I assume you would have detected this so, apologies that this does not address your issue. But, if others reading this have had the same issue or same frustration, please weigh in

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

I'm quite a new be to photography in general and the x100v specifically - so I assumed its me doing things wrong... But seems I'm not the only one.

@Tor_B Did you find ways to get better results? 

Anyone else? 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
On 6/22/2022 at 9:22 PM, John D said:

I seriously doubt that what I am going to say will solve your problem (sorry), but its related so I thought I'd throw this in.

Overall I love the X100v (and also have a Sony (a/7/r/4).  I also usually use single shot autofocus also smallest or, more often, next smallest box.  My frustration with the focus is keeping the point of focus in the middle of the frame.  I want to start each shot with the focus point being directly in the middle and then moving it when/if I deem necessary.  Whether I use the touch screen to center it, or if I use the button (lever? I don't know what to call it) - give it a double click to center it - it moves but... it doesnt stay there. Its. just too easy to touch either the lever or the screen as one is shooting and then the next shot(s) are crap. 

There is no way I've found to actually lock it in a way that stays locked in the center (on the other hand, my Sony does this very well). Its too easy to touch the screen or the lever accidentally.  So, if I'm shooting quickly sometimes i miss the fact that it moved and the shot is out of focus because its focussing on one corner or another.  

I assume you would have detected this so, apologies that this does not address your issue. But, if others reading this have had the same issue or same frustration, please weigh in

You can turn off the touch screen, and if you press and hold the lever you can adjust its setting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I found the reddit topic i refere to :  https://www.reddit.com/r/davinciresolve/comments/1pc3f1e/cant_apply_new_fujifilm_gfx_55_lut/ "Update for y'all, It's just like what @ExpBalSat said, it's because of the backslashes in the names break them. I changed the file name and it works now. "   For me it was the solution. Realy annoying if it doesn’t work for you 😕  
    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
    • I don’t have the 23 f2 but I have read several times that it is considered a little soft at close distance, compared to the 23 f1.4 lenses. These will also focus at shorter distance from the subject, esp. the new one. So that might make a difference. The new 23 f1.4 LM WR  has better resolution, esp. in regard to the 40Mpix sensors, which you don’t have on the X-T2. What practical difference that makes for the value of the pictures one makes is disputable and subjective.  f1.4 will gather more light but with a smaller DOF, which may be desirable in some situations but not so in others, depends. If you like to shoot close ups, you will probably use higher f numbers to get a bigger DOF. Same for landscapes. If you are a bokeh fan, yes the f1.4 lens are better.  The older 23 f1.4 lens that you are considering is a very good and respected lens. The f1.4 vs f2 aperture per se is perhaps not so important. The 23 f2 is very small, light and practical and a great lens for travel and landscapes. So, go figure. I am afraid I just sent you further down the road to insanity !
    • First post here but long time fuji shorter. I use the XT2 with the 23mm f2 / 35mm 1.4 / 16-80mm f4 I'm considering the 23mm f1.4 r (Non-WR) About me: - I shoot black and white only. - I like macro details to wide open landscapes and everything in-between. - I shoot mostly for art, intrigue and creativity of the image. My question - is the 23mm f1.4 going to offer me any meaningful difference over the f2 for the above scenarios Thanks and sorry for bringing it up again...
×
×
  • Create New...