Jump to content

SmallRig for X-T4 advice

maxj71

By maxj71
in Fuji X-T4

 Share

Recommended Posts

maxj71 Newbie

maxj71

Posted
Posted (edited)

Hey guys,

Just got an X-T4 recently. Amazing camera. I'm looking to get a SmallRig kit and build it up over time. Initially, I'd like to have a follow focus setup, along with something to stack filters.

For the filters, I was looking at the SmallRig Mini Matte box. I believe there is a model with room for two 4 x 5.65 filters. The problem is, individual 4 x 5.65 filters seem to be very expensive.  I have three lenses, all Fuji: 23mm 1.4, 35mm 1.4, and the 56mm 1.2. Any advice on the easiest and most cost efficient way to use both of these filters for all lenses would be much appreciated. Should I just bite the bullet, get the matte box, then pay for maybe two ND filters, and the Black Pro-Mist? Or, is using step-up rings, and then just using the matte box to avoid glare a simpler way to go.  A system that combines a variable ND and a single Black Pro-Mist would be ideal.

Sorry if these are noob questions. I mainly shoot with a Mavic 2 Pro drone, where the ND filters are simply clicked on and off to the drone's lens.

Cheers,

Max

 

Edited by maxj71
Additional info
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
Razbak Rookie

Razbak

Posted
Posted

Hi

 

The "4 x 5.65 filters" are grad filters right?...and have always been expensive. Promist Blacks. I had them in the early nineties or 35mm TVC's.

With filters in post now, it is possible you don't need them right now. Experiment with post filters first perhaps.

Using a matt box with 2 or three filters will cover all yr lenses provided you take into account wide angle lenses.

A rig is a good idea - look around for yr options - there are heaps of options out there.. There are options that might have more to hang gear off - including audio...read around friend.

Think broad before u buy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Don Barar
      LUT doesn't works on resolve

      By Don Barar · Posted

      Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • crazyfields
      Please save me from insanity 23mm f2 vs F1.4r

      By crazyfields · Posted

      Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
    • George_P
      Please save me from insanity 23mm f2 vs F1.4r

      By George_P · Posted

      I don’t have the 23 f2 but I have read several times that it is considered a little soft at close distance, compared to the 23 f1.4 lenses. These will also focus at shorter distance from the subject, esp. the new one. So that might make a difference. The new 23 f1.4 LM WR  has better resolution, esp. in regard to the 40Mpix sensors, which you don’t have on the X-T2. What practical difference that makes for the value of the pictures one makes is disputable and subjective.  f1.4 will gather more light but with a smaller DOF, which may be desirable in some situations but not so in others, depends. If you like to shoot close ups, you will probably use higher f numbers to get a bigger DOF. Same for landscapes. If you are a bokeh fan, yes the f1.4 lens are better.  The older 23 f1.4 lens that you are considering is a very good and respected lens. The f1.4 vs f2 aperture per se is perhaps not so important. The 23 f2 is very small, light and practical and a great lens for travel and landscapes. So, go figure. I am afraid I just sent you further down the road to insanity !
    • crazyfields
      Please save me from insanity 23mm f2 vs F1.4r

      By crazyfields · Posted

      First post here but long time fuji shorter. I use the XT2 with the 23mm f2 / 35mm 1.4 / 16-80mm f4 I'm considering the 23mm f1.4 r (Non-WR) About me: - I shoot black and white only. - I like macro details to wide open landscapes and everything in-between. - I shoot mostly for art, intrigue and creativity of the image. My question - is the 23mm f1.4 going to offer me any meaningful difference over the f2 for the above scenarios Thanks and sorry for bringing it up again...
    • DavidJohn
      Unmarked government installation

      By DavidJohn · Posted

      I discovered this unmarked government installation today.  

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

×
×
  • Create New...