Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Greetings! First post on this forum. Glad to *finally* be a member. Here are a few snaps I took at an old prison in Cuba. It is located on the Isla de la Juventad, which is a 30 minute ride in a windowless Anitov AN-26 South of Havana.

 

...a bit of background - I saw this place photographed at the National Gallery in Ottawa, Canada, and decided if I ever made it to Cuba I would go and check it out. My father and I lucked out in October 2013 to go down for a couple of weeks but before I went, a good photographer friend threw down the proverbial gauntlet and challenged me: "One camera, one lens".

 

...for two weeks in Cuba.

 

After my protestations subsided I thought that maybe he was on to something. There is an incredible freedom to only have one lens at your disposal. Want a wider view? Nope - or start walking. Longer view? Nope - or start walking. You get to work with what you have. 

 

In this case it was a Fuji X100 with a lovely Luigi Crescini case. I lament, greatly, ever selling that camera. It was a perfect fit for our trip to Cuba.  Oh, just an aside - I'm Canadian and there was never any issues with Canadians visiting Cuba. Daily direct flights from Toronto to Havana.

 

At any rate, the Presidio Modelo is a panopticon prison modelled on the prison built at Joliette, in Illinois. Jeremy Bentham came up with the idea - wikipedia has a great entry on the background. It is located in a massive space, 5 cellblocks with a central dining hall. At its height it had 3000 prisoners, including a certain Fidel Castro after one of his attempts to overthrow Battista. When we went we were the only ones there. I don't think it's possible to visit a more surreal place. It was, quite simply, amazing. 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • A fungus in the forest.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      (p.s. Open Topic.)  
    • The backslashes you are referring are just symbols denoting path.  Once you import into these LUTS into Davinci Resolve those backslashes are removed by default and you only see is the true file name which has no backslashes.  Convince yourself of this by opening the LUT folder from the Davinci Resolve Project Settings.  Do you see any backslashes in those LUT names? Of course not.  The only name you see is the one that has the underscores and the periods. These LUTS work as designed without having to change any path names.  However, they need to be set up properly through CSTs and by what is supported in Davinci Resolve.  Hence, the FLog2C film simulation LUTS cannot be used because Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut color space and the FLog2C gamut. Alternatively, Davinci Resolve does support Flog2 film simulation LUTS because the color space for FLog2 is Rec 2020 and there is an FLog2 gamut. If all you are doing is changing the path names then you are not getting the correct results.
    • I found the reddit topic i refere to :  https://www.reddit.com/r/davinciresolve/comments/1pc3f1e/cant_apply_new_fujifilm_gfx_55_lut/ "Update for y'all, It's just like what @ExpBalSat said, it's because of the backslashes in the names break them. I changed the file name and it works now. "   For me it was the solution. Realy annoying if it doesn’t work for you 😕  
    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
×
×
  • Create New...