Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Probably not.. I'm curious though, what would be the appeal of this vs the 16-55mm f/2.8 WR? The OIS? The way I understand it, the constantly aperture in the 16-55mm sacrifices the OIS because you can gather twice as much light at the long end (somewhat) negating the need for stabilization.

That, and the size and weight of having OIS in lens this would been unreasonable. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...