More testing of lenses today.
Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 IF ED VR (same applies to VR II) - dreadful. Heavy vignette at all focal lengths and apertures. Obvioulsy fine in 35mm mode.
Nikon 70-200 f/4 - some vignetting at full frame (similar to 24mm f/1.8 and Sigma 105 f/2.8 so probably correctable or slight crop to 80-90MP). Perfect in 35mm mode.
Zeiss C/Y 80-200 f/4 (manual focus/aperture) - slight vignette but better than both the above.
Zeiss 28-85 f/3.3 (c/y manual focus/aperture) - not as bad as the Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 but still dreadful.
Sigma 24mm f/2.8 superwide - heavy vignette as above.
I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus.
The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format.
Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.
24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.
50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens.
105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable.
300 f/4 likewise the 105.
I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.
Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.
I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.
The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly.
Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar.
80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable.
All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.
I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results.