MACKUK

14 23 56.
 
I like the looks of the 16 but i don't need shallow DOF at a wide angle.
 
Also really love the character of the 35 but that focal length can feel like a bit of a compromise sometimes. Too tight for environmentals, too wide for head and shoulders type shots.

In a sense, 14, 23, 56.  In reality, I have the 14mm and the original 56 and the X100s.

Mine actually 14 - 23 - 56
 
+ 50-140
 
And later 90

Hi Everyone,
 
Just purchased a X-T1,  XF 18-55mm, XF 55-200, XF 60mm, XF 14mm and Nissan I40 and looking forward to taking some (hopefully) great images with my new kit.  
 
I have been into photography as an amateur for a good few years and latterly have been in the Pentax fold with a K3 and had some really good limited lenses but add some zooms and the weight and bulk starts to go up.  Although I did try an OMD EM5 for a few months and liked compact size of the system I wasn't convinced about the IQ especially on larger print sizes. I am hopeful, given the quality of the first few images taken with my X-T1 so far that  I will have no such issues going forward.
 
Really like the camera, the lenses are superbly built and boy do I like the reduction in bulk / weight for when I am out and about in the hills.
 
Don
https://www.flickr.com/photos/108420945@N06/ 
 
 

Fuji X is great for landscape. Don't let all the megapixels guys fool you. I get very acceptable 20x30 prints from my XT-1 - such as this... with 18-55mm @ ISO 200.