Smorton

I have printed 18x12 from a cropped image made with an X-E1. I do not see any shortcoming with respect to resolution. I think you will just fine with the X-T2. In fact, now that I'm using an X-PRO2 (same sensor as X-T2) it's not the additional pixels that continue to surprise, it's the dynamic range that is the biggest deal. Situations that previously called for HDR now only need LR's Dhadow and Highlight sliders.

But you said you'll print occasionally at 16x20. Now that fact is no longer valid? BTW, I printed 24x36 with a photo I took with the X-E1, which is only 16 megapixels. It looked amazing. 
 
Honestly though, you can't go wrong with either camera. 
 

I switched from a D800 and a D800e to the X-T1 and the X-T2. Haven't looked back. Enjoying every moment.  Images are tack sharp and clear, I've made up to 36 x24 prints, and I couldn't be happier especially knowing I don't have to lug the dSLR around anymore.

Greetings:
 
I have been thinking about buying a Nikon D750.  Then I handled (briefly) a Fuji X-T2.  I much preferred the handling of the X-T2.
 
My question is whether you give up much in terms of image quality with the X-T2 vs. Nikon D750.  I would assume you do because of ff vs. crop.  I am not printing billboards.  I would print occasionally 16 x 20 approx.
 
I am not a professional and my photos are nothing fancy but I do like high resolution, etc.
 
I am sorry if I am asking a repeat question.
 
Thank you.
 
SM

No, I traded it in. Completely switched systems. Ended up getting x-t2, 16mm f/1.4, 23mm/1.4, 35mm /1.4, kit lens 18-55 2.8-4, Samyang 50mm /1.2, grip.
 
Loving it so far. Wouldn't go back if you paid me. Used it in studio, on location, with family.
 
I'm a convert.
 
Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk