Ember42

I have the 14mm f/2.8 and the 56 f/1.2. I want an XF 28 f/2.0 WR. Optically like the 14 (no distortion, sharp over the frame stopped down) with an aperture ring. A true normal FL (FL = image circle). I find 23 too wide or night wide enough and 35 too tight much of the time.

14-42 f/4 OIS WR. - Usage hiking / travel / general Emphasis on relatively low distortion, even sharpness across the frame at infinity focus, low vignetting and flare resistance. Would accept f5.6 constant or slightly shorter on the long end if this would keep the size down and have excellent wide open properties. 30-60 f/2 OIS - Usage long end of event / candid portrait Emphasis on center sharpness and bokeh, wide end covers true normal for body length portraits / small group, up to 90mm for headshots. Gives more subject isolation than the more general 16-55 and add OIS to help with dim light conditions. Complements longer dedicated portrait lenses. with a more flexible option when mingling. 40-80 could be be an alternative, but the wider start would help with being more general while still being fast and long enough to be a standout portrait lens. WR would be nice but not strictly necessary. These two would probably cover everything I do with the X, and cover different enough things that I would only need one at a time.