Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 months later...

Ciao

l'unico vero problema è la dimensione del file, davvero enorme anche usando il JPEG (superfine).

Per ridurre la mole di dati, lascio perdere il 4:3 e faccio foto in 3:2 o 16:9 (il numero di pixel orizzontali non cambia e quindi non si riduce la nitidezza).

Dovrai comunque avere un PC potente e avere MOLTA pazienza soprattutto se userai programmi di denoising...

Edited by Giampaolo Masserano
Link to post
Share on other sites

The only real problem is the file size, which is truly enormous even when using JPEG (superfine). To reduce the amount of data, I skip the 4:3 aspect ratio and shoot in 3:2 or 16:9 (the number of horizontal pixels doesn't change, so sharpness isn't affected). You'll still need a powerful PC and a LOT of patience, especially if you'll be using denoising programs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Giampaolo Masserano said:

The only real problem is the file size, which is truly enormous even when using JPEG (superfine). To reduce the amount of data, I skip the 4:3 aspect ratio and shoot in 3:2 or 16:9 (the number of horizontal pixels doesn't change, so sharpness isn't affected). You'll still need a powerful PC and a LOT of patience, especially if you'll be using denoising programs.

I bought one a while ago now. I don't find file size a problem, but compared to the R5 the design of the camera is less ergonomical and it's not as easy to handle physically.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently went from Nikon Dx series -> Fuji X-T4 -> GFX100s II.

I've now had the GFX for almost 3 weeks and find it generally to be pretty intuitive and the overall design to be very good. It fits neatly in the hand and although there's a reasonable amount of heft its handling minimises it well. 

All the buttons are programmable to put the functions you need close at hand and the customised menus are easy to use. The only thing I'm not sure about is the joystick operation and the inconsistent use of the touchscreen - it works for some things but not others. 

All that being said the image quality is simply astonishing SOOC. 

As a flexible high resolution system it works very well. You can get adapters to use non-Fuji lenses as if they are native (with some caveats about sensor coverage). For example smart adapters are available to use the GFX with Nikon AF-S or Canon EF-S lenses. Some will give full sensor coverage and some won't but even as a full frame 35mm camera its still 60MP.

Edited by thelostkiwi
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Well done! p.s. Welcome to the forum.
    • I think reassigning the exposure compensation dial a good start.  The 520 page online manual should be condensed along with the number of setting options. Maybe they could have multiple firmware options for the X-E5; a pro-version, a photo enthusiasts version and a point and shoot version.  I love my X-E5 photographs but as a typical senior, with declining cognitive skills, I’m sorry say that I find the current singular version unnecessarily challenging. 
    • I was told the GFX 100 II couldn't do this so I decided to test it:    

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • You appear certain you intend to use this lens for astrophotography. Hmmm. Are you willing to consider the suggestion you will be better off trying the XF-500mm prime lens instead? Simply put, prime lenses are way better than zoom lenses for astrophotography while the XF 150-600mm is great for terra photography. 1.) The lens hood’s connection placement on zoom lenses is right on the very edge of the lens body. This is a loose connection that allows any tiny stray light to enter the lens and then bounce around the many lens element groups, ending up on the sensor, causing all kinds of gradient troubles. For terra photography, cough, cough -daytime photography- cough, cough, this is not a problem because that little stray light is lost among the bright daytime backgrounds. Prime lens hood’s loose connection placement tends to be further up on the lens body, so stray light is usually not able to bounce into the lens so easily. 2.) Weather changes affects the lenses. All lenses can have focus creep even when pointed horizontally, cold and hot causes the mechanical parts to expand or contract differently, but especially when pointed up in the sky because gravity also pulls on the parts. Zoom lenses additionally have something called ‘zoom creep’ which you can figure into the issues you will face during your sessions. Essentially, you need to refocus when it gets cooler during the night. If you are determined to try this lens anyway, best wishes!!! It is possible to make a homemade lens hood. There are plenty of companies that sell dew heater straps fitting this lens to keep it from frosting over during your sessions. Also, you can find Bahtinov Masks or Carey Masks that will fit the lens. These make focusing on the stars much, much easier and are not difficult to learn how to. Or, if your camera body is one of the top line bodies that Fujifilm has released the SDK for, various astrophotography apps will take the live view and help you focus. Say X-T3 but not X-T30, etc. p.s. Welcome to the forum.
    • I had no problem finding a spot at the beach this afternoon.  Was not crowded at all. GFX100 RF.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

×
×
  • Create New...