Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I first took a photo 50 years ago, with one of the first Pentax Spotmatic cameras in the UK, it belonged to my Father who was a forensic photographer. He taught me a lot about photography, including how to use and develop film from his 20" x 16"  laboratory camera which didn't have a shutter - you just removed the lens cap and counted! I progressed from a Kodak Instamatic 133X to rangefinder cameras and when I got a job in Dixons I bought a Chinon SLR with staff discount. I would have bought a Fuji ST605N but I got more discount on the Chinon! I was then employed by the BBC as a TV cameraman but didn't last long - I was much better at audio and that's where I've made my career, photography is my hobby.

 

I'm a technologist and was an early adopter of digital photography, using a Mavica camera with a sensor 640 x 480 pixels, it took pictures on a floppy disc. After using various Olympus digital cameras including the fabulous 8080WZ I bought a Lumix G1 twin lens kit the first day they were available in the UK and then bought almost every body and lens for Lumix Micro Four Thirds as they were released. I fell out with Lumix because of the GH3 viewfinder, it was small and had blurred corners and the coating came off if it got damp. This happened to quite a few other people too. Interestingly DPReview removed a post I made on their forum about the problem when the coating started to come off the second viewfinder and sent me an email warning me about "trolling"... I know they have to keep on the right side of the manufacturers but I hadn't expected them to go that far.

 

So I sold my Lumix bodies and lenses and bought an X-T1 in December 2014. I love it. The quality is fine as far as I'm concerned with a lot less noise at higher iSO than the old Lumix, though I do struggle a little with sharpening in Lightroom sometimes, the same as many others. Of course the video quality is nothing like as good as I was getting from the GH3 but I shoot video rarely, and usually just to capture the sound of a place. The best thing about the X-T1 is the use of separate engraved dials for each function, the first time I picked one up it felt like coming home. Whatever image quality comparison one might make with other cameras, for me the viewfinder and control layout of the X-T1 have put the joy back into photography.

 

You can see some of my efforts on Flickr

https://www.flickr.com/photos/rupert_brun/

 

Rupert

p.s. I'm a keen fan of the BBC Radio 4 documentary "The Archers" and Barwick Green is the name of the theme tune. I'm @BarwickGreen on Twitter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
    • How does one make sure that Fuji's image correction is turned on to correct barrel and pin-cushion distortion on a GFX 100 or GFX100S when using the GF20-35? Is it only applied to the jpegs and not to the raw files? (I was surprised to discover the barrel distortion on the GF 35-70mm lens.) I normally shoot in raw with jpeg back-up and use the raw files, which I convert either in Affinity Photo 2 when editing with that program or in Raw File Converter Ex 3.0 by Silkypix if I wish to process the image in Photoshop CS6. (Adobe DNG is also a possibility.) Thank you for the help. Trevor
×
×
  • Create New...