Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello. I've posted a few things, so I had better introduce myself for those of you who might be interested.

 

Been shooting since 1977, initially because I was recruited to be the school yearbook photographer. After graduating, I went to work in camera shops, which I loved. I purchased Nikon gear (FMs) and mostly prime Nikkor lenses like the 24 f.2.8, 35 f/1.4, and the 105 f/2.5. It was a happy time in my life and I loved learning how to shoot. My friends and I ran around shooting for fun all the time, burning through roll after roll of Kodachrome.

 

After several years, I was hired as a tech rep at the late, great Minolta Corp. That was followed by a stint in sales, first at Minolta then at Nikon, both in Southern California. During that time I had enormous sample accounts comprising all the cameras and most of the lenses that each company offered for sale. I even had expense accounts for film and processing. I loved shooting but I hated selling.

 

I left that field and finally went to college. I shot through that decade, using an FE-2 and Nikkor lenses. I worked in camera shops while going to school and all was great again for a while, but the era of the brick and mortar photo store was coming to a close.

 

When I got married, I went digital when a buddy gave me a Canon P&S as a present. A few years later, when my wife and I went to Australia for asix-week holiday, I reasoned that it was time for a digital SLR. I settled on Canon Rebel because they had the best/most affordable model at the time. I upgraded later to a 40D and then a couple of years ago to a 6D.

 

Most recently, I decided that I had to try a mirrorless camera. As you've heard a thousand times, my equipment was too damned heavy. I agonized over spec sheets for a few months and ultimately decided on a used Fuji XE-2. I was very impressed with the camera and the ease with which I upgraded the firmware resulting in a whole new camera. I got the camera with the 18-55 kit lens. Soon after followed a 35mm f/1.4, a 56mm f/1.2, and a 90mm f/2.0. I dabbled with the 14mm f/2.8 but sent it back in favor of the 16mm f/1.4. Now I'm just trying to decide between the X-Pro 2 and the upcoming XT-?.

 

So with this Fuji camera, the image quality of which blows me a way, I have returned to my roots. Little in the way of zoom, most lenses without OIS, and an honest-to-goodness aperture ring and shutter-speed dial. I love the experience of shooting and am really impressed with the image quality. I've been shooting a FF DSLR, and I like my Fuji images better.

 

Long intro. On the off-chance that you're still reading, thank you. I'm glad to be here and appreciate all the information and great photography.

 

TM

 

Here's a recent shot of my daughter taken with the 56mm.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by Tommyboy
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • A fungus in the forest.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      (p.s. Open Topic.)  
    • The backslashes you are referring are just symbols denoting path.  Once you import into these LUTS into Davinci Resolve those backslashes are removed by default and you only see is the true file name which has no backslashes.  Convince yourself of this by opening the LUT folder from the Davinci Resolve Project Settings.  Do you see any backslashes in those LUT names? Of course not.  The only name you see is the one that has the underscores and the periods. These LUTS work as designed without having to change any path names.  However, they need to be set up properly through CSTs and by what is supported in Davinci Resolve.  Hence, the FLog2C film simulation LUTS cannot be used because Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut color space and the FLog2C gamut. Alternatively, Davinci Resolve does support Flog2 film simulation LUTS because the color space for FLog2 is Rec 2020 and there is an FLog2 gamut. If all you are doing is changing the path names then you are not getting the correct results.
    • I found the reddit topic i refere to :  https://www.reddit.com/r/davinciresolve/comments/1pc3f1e/cant_apply_new_fujifilm_gfx_55_lut/ "Update for y'all, It's just like what @ExpBalSat said, it's because of the backslashes in the names break them. I changed the file name and it works now. "   For me it was the solution. Realy annoying if it doesn’t work for you 😕  
    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
×
×
  • Create New...