Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ok so apparently everyone (Amazon and local dealers in Moscow) sell this DC kit for my Fujifilm X-T2 that contains a dummy battery and a 9V adapter. They are very adamant about using the dummy battery with their adapter.

Naturally, my interest has been aroused by that. At first I thought maybe there was some protective electronics inside the dummy like a voltage stabilizer or overvoltage/mispolarity protection. So I got one and probed it with the multimeter - the battery plus and minus terminals were wired directly to the DC jack so that theory goes out the window.

Now it looks like it's just pure marketing, but I'm still unsure about the voltage rating. If they were producing the battery to be used with a wide variety of common 9V supplies, I would understand the voltage rating. But since they has gone to some lengths as to forbid using any DC brick other than their own (and even made the DC jack a 5mm one instead of the common 5.5mm), I'm curious - what gives? Does the camera react to a higher than nominal voltage on the battery port in some way? the original battery is of course Li-Ion 2S 7.4V.

I had no issues powering the camera via a dummy with a li-ion battery pack of 4x18650 just like I was doing with my older Sony, but it looks dodgy still - I feel like I'm missing something.

I'll be obliged for any input.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well as I expected, directly connecting a pack of Nx2S li-ion batteries did the trick - as expected, the camera considered them to be just an ordinary battery and because the chemistry is the same, it also correctly shows the state of charge on screen. Thanks, fujifilm engineers, for not going the smartsy-fartsy chipped battery route.

Also I'vee a thread about camera overheating on dummy battery - that might be related to some amount of overvoltage that I described in the opening post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...