None of the XF lenses I own have depth of field scales (so no hyperfocal marking). The X-T5 is weather-sealed and big enough (mine has the accessory MHG-XT% grip fitted) to use the longer telephoto zooms. I have the XF 70-300 and XF 150-600. I would say it is useful for wildlife photography (I mainly do birds), and roughly equivalent to the Nikon D500 in most situations. AF will be different and possibly inferior in some situations. The X-T5 will work well for street/landscape/everything that comes up. Fitted with the compact primes it's light enough and compact enough. XF 16/2.8, 18/2, 23/2, 27/2.8, 35/1.4 or 35/2, 50/2 are all compact and light and match well with the X-T5. XF 16/2.8, 23/2, 35/2 are all weather sealed too (as is the later version of the 27/2.8). I'm unsure about mount adapters and which adapted lenses give AF, EXIF, etc. I have a mechanical only Nikon F to Fuji X adapter, but it's only for an older AF 200/4 micro nikkor so I don't need AF/EXIF, etc.

You'll be asked to post in English. Hello, This is my first message on the forum. I come a little to fish for information to find the right way to buy. I'm looking for the lightness that's my Number One criterion, and then I'd like to know if Fujinon lenses have hyperfocal tagging? I'm looking for a camera to have with me all the time without thinking about the heaviness of the backpack. I went from reflex to hybrid at first it was all pink and then with the purchase of a little zoom my back quickly unduffering, for two days I haven't taken my backpack, yet a model not too heavy 800 g for the bag, I'm looking again. I think in time as Fuji photographs you see what I mean. I hesitate between several apn the Fuji X-T 5 / 50 / X-S20. The photos I want to take are street, landscapes and everything that comes up to me, preference to manual mode for 99% of my photos, not for the map. If in the pdv there is a little rain or spit I want to be able to continue making my pictures without having to put everything away. Then comes another photography theme that is wild animal photography, the question is whether one of these three apn is capable of doing this type of photo and of competing equal or greater with the Nikon D500. I know that the X-H2 series is capable of doing so, unfortunately it is beyond my means. On the objective side, I thought of 16-80 as a Swiss knife, with an 18mm and are there adaptor rings to come from another brand that work 100% for exposure data and map or not? Thank you in advance for your feedback. Cordially.

If you're using Lightroom (and maybe other software). you need to set it to download the raw and the jpg. Then you'll have thew raw (colour) with it's generated preview (also in colour), and the jpg (acros b&w) available for editing.

I'd be looking for a replacement lens (secondhand likely to be cheaper than a repair to your wet lens).

Thanks Bro