I don't consider myself a pixel peeper at all... I am a professional photographer, working with Canon 5D camera's, and also using a Fuji X-T2 recently.
I have used Fuji camera's before, but only for my vacations and free work projects. For that purpose I was happy with the results I get out of LR. But now I want to use Fuji also for some professional work, and then I am going to look more critical at the raw processing and the results.
Now last week I have sent some images to a client of mine, taken with the T2 and edited in LR. Pictures from a building in a green park (so with a lot of foliage surrounding the building). And then my client complained about the strange way the foliage looked to him... And I can only say that his complaint was right!
The way LR renders the RAF files is just not good enough for professional use.
So this is not about pixel peeping but about making money with photography and keeping clients happy, take them seriously by providing them with pictures with the highest possible IQ!
Is just me, or Lightroom 6.3 is better now rendering details on X-Trans files?
I make a 1:1 comparison between LR 6.3 and C1 pro 8 and I find the better Lr files!
Anyone else find this results?
FujiFilm X-E1 here.
CHAPS reacted to akphoto in Lightroom for x-trans... seriously?
CHAPS got a reaction from Mike G in Lightroom CC 2015 1.1 is still horrible bad with Xtrans files...