nat2049

I am planning to get a wide angle lens for landscape photography. I have used canon's 24-105 before, and found that I mostly crop in the image I took at the 24mm, but I ve seen reviews on the 16mm f1.4 and its regarded as the "best" FujiFilm lens, is that really true? I am attracted to the 23mm f2 because of the size (I use a xt20). I can get them for about the same price on some Chinese used camera market. How big is the image quality difference between the two, and if there's not a big difference, I might just go with the 23mm, but I feel like I'm missing out on a very good deal (I can get the 16mm for 350 CAD). Can anyone help me with this decision?

I included it in the title. But I have decided to sell my 15-45mm and buy 35mm f2 for street, and maybe landscape? If I find its focal length too long for landscape, I'll get a 16mm or 23mm. Is this a good idea? Portability is also quite important for me so not planning to get bulky lenses.

Hello, I just bought an xt20 with a 15-45mm lens, but I just switched from Canon 5d markii with a 24-105 f4 lens. I just sold my old gear and have some cash lying around so I can upgrade for a more premium prime lens. Which focal length should I get? Currently, I am considering prime lens with a focal length of 23-50mm. Should I sell my 15-45mm, and buy prime lenses for all the range I like? Or should I keep my 15-45mm and buy 1 prime lens (50mm maybe) since 15-45mm at 45mm is quite lacking? Just want to make the most out of my money😆