Jump to content

HakanaII

Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

HakanaII's Achievements

  1. Thank you for answer. I prefer AF for this use case. 16mm or 18mm is probably best as you write with crop with X-T5 - but the f1.4 alternatives are a little expensive. In the end it might be worth it. Viltrox 23 is really cheap used, I just wish it was a little wider to really pair with XF 33mm. But maybe 23mm and 33mm are OK to have side by side. I could also just sell XF 33 with some profit and get XF 23/1.4WR 😃
  2. Hi, I´m new with X-T5 coming from Olympus, got a good deal with the camera and XF 33/1.4WR. 33mm is a bit tight indoors with family, kids & friends. What would you recommend for this (WR not needed)? I´ll buy used, maybe 500€ at most (cheaper preferably): Viltrox 23/1.4 XF 18/2 16/1.4 Viltrox 13/1.4 (might be too big) Alternatives?
  3. Hi, I´m not in to Fuji yet, but am thinking about it. I might sell E-M5iii, 12-100, 20mm 1.4 and some stuff I don´t use. In that case I would buy X-T5 or X-T3, 16-80, a f1.4 WR lens. It might cost me an additional 850-1000€ if X-T5. I need some good advice (probably against this because of my wife) if it´s a good idea. My (swipe) reasons: The tilt screen of X-T5 / X-T3 Better low light performance, I often shoot in low light Better autofocus I often crop and save pictures in 16:9 and 3:2 Dials Better build quality, maybe being able to use pd-clip Slow motion 240fps might be nice on X-T5 If jpg:s are nice I save them, but often shoot RAW and use DXO for denoise Doubts: No IBIS on X-T3 Weather sealing, the camera comes along on hikes, skiing etc in all sorts of weather. It´ll take some hits maybe. Never had problems with Olympus. Money, if X-T5. I buy used stuff, so X-T3 is OK. In the end there might not be that much of difference in low light performance? Size (though 16-80 is smaller than 12-100 and I´ve got E-P7 with Leica 15mm as small kit)
×
×
  • Create New...