Jump to content

Inazuma

Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Inazuma's Achievements

  1. I think you need to reread it again. He/she didn't specify it when talking about the noise.
  2. OP didn't specify if he was talking about RAWs or JPG's. Also dpreview's comparison tool gives jpegs from SOOC as well as raw processed by ACR (like you said).
  3. Just registered on this forum to give my thoughts on this. Well not really my thoughts but my evidence. https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr18=lowlight&attr13_0=sony_a6300&attr13_1=fujifilm_xt1&attr13_2=fujifilm_xt2&attr13_3=nikon_d5500&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr15_2=raw&attr15_3=raw&attr16_0=6400&attr16_1=6400&attr16_2=6400&attr16_3=6400&attr171_0=off&normalization=full&widget=1&x=0.345942857142857&y=-0.08956372968349002 On that page you can clearly see the X-T2 has a similar amount of noise to the X-T1, maybe a little better, whilst presenting a good deal more detail. I previously had the Sony a6300 which I was OK with shooting at ISO 12800. So it surprises me that the X-T2 is actually even better.
×
×
  • Create New...